Friday 25 November 2011

Freddie Starr stuns Muhammad Ali, Lego rugby league and the final scores

 

1) George Green: the new Matty Burrows. And if you've been living under a rock for the last year, here's the old Matty Burrows. Meanwhile, women's football brilliance. Further back in time, this could have been one of the greatest volleys of all time from Trevor Brooking. Instead it turned out to be one of Peter Shilton's greatest ever saves.

2) It's a shame the Bryan brothers had to ruin this through-the-legs lob from Bob against Philipp Petzschner and Jürgen Melzer with a chest bump at the O2 Arena. Anyway Rafael Nadal got there first earlier this year against Novak Djokovic in Madrid.

3) At the grand old age of 81, Tim Gudgin has retired from reading out the football results on Final Score, having been with the BBC since 1965. He probably deserved more than a send-off from 'Chappers'. Here he is in 1998 on the 40th anniversary of Grandstand, doing what he does best. Although he wasn't always at his best – but to be fair to him, that's one messy set of Premier League results, and he did bring more life to the party than Mark E Smith. The BBC should have given Mel Smith a go instead.

4) The Ronnie Rosenthal of the NHL.

5) What people don't realise about this amazing jumping dog is that the man in the clip is actually hiding a trampoline up his shirt.

6) Ah Lego. Whatever football does, rugby league does, if not better then certainly with more hardcore tackles.

Graham Henry does not want England job but could help European club

 

Graham Henry is not interested in returning to Test rugby but may be tempted by an advisory role with a Heineken Cup side. Photograph: Jason O'Brien/Action Images

Graham Henry has firmly shut the door on any potential coaching job with England, insisting he has no interest in a role at Twickenham. "I've got enough problems," said the World Cup winner, who will coach the Barbarians against Australia this Saturday.

Asked to indicate on a scale of one to 10 how likely he was to work again at Test level, he replied: "Zero. You never say never but I just think it's time to move on."

His decision will be greeted with dismay by those within the Rugby Football Union who had hoped Henry might yet be persuaded to help out on a consultancy basis during the Six Nations Championship. With Nick Mallett also reiterating he is unavailable for any role before June at the earliest, the prospect of England enticing a top-level overseas coach is fast receding.

Henry, who flew to Europe last week and has been spending time with old friends in Wales, is certainly not for turning. "Firstly, I'm contracted to the New Zealand Rugby Union until the end of March and secondly I've no desire to coach a team. I've done 140 Tests and that's probably enough," he said, confirming his intention to live primarily in his homeland.

"I've been in New Zealand a long time and you get focused on what you're doing, not what other people are doing. You just haven't got the time, the energy or the desire. My knowledge of what's happening [in England] is very limited."

The only temptation, it seems, would be an advisory role with an ambitious European club. "I've had a chat to a couple of people but I don't want to go into that. If there is somebody who wants me as an adviser, perhaps a Heineken Cup team, I'd be interested in looking at that. I like what I see in that competition and there are some interesting places to go to. Maybe if an occasion arose it could happen next year."

He has also ruled out any possible reunion with the 2013 Lions, having coached them against the Wallabies in 2001. "I didn't coach particularly well in 2001 because I didn't get to know the players enough. Do you think I want to get it right? Probably not. There would be some very good coaches in line for that and I wish them well."

Henry said he was slightly surprised by Martin Johnson's departure as England manager, believing that coaches tend to improve with age. "If a person is a quality coach I think they learn a lot from their experiences in the job and they get better at it. Too often unions sack people when they are going to get better at what they do. But that's a general statement. I can't comment about Martin's coaching because I've never seen him coach."

Whatever Henry does next, though, his reputation is assured following New Zealand's World Cup triumph. "I enjoyed the tournament. I was pretty relaxed apart from the last half-hour against France, when I shat myself most of the time. The French played like boys in the pool stages against us but they played like giants in the final. They played better than us but we hung in there and showed a lot of faith in each other. That trust was pretty important. They guys were pretty close as individuals and I think that showed. I had nightmares in the last 30 minutes but I haven't had nightmares since."

He is now supportive of revived attempts, as reported in the Guardian this month, to launch some kind of World Club Challenge. "A game between the Super 15 champions and the Heineken Cup champions at the Millennium Stadium would be very interesting, wouldn't it? It's just a matter of fitting it in."

Returning drugs cheats will not receive funding, says UK Sport

 

Dwain Chambers will be denied public or lottery funding even if his lifetime Olympic ban is lifted. Photograph: Alexander Hassenstein/Bongarts/Getty Images

The lifetime ban on serious drug cheats receiving public funding will be maintained even if the British Olympic Association is forced to scrap its lifetime exclusion for doping offenders, the head of UK Sport has insisted.

The BOA faces a battle in court after the World Anti-Doping Agency ruled that its bylaw violates the global code. Liz Nicholl, chief executive of funding body UK Sport, said that the policy of a life ban on funding for any athlete who has received a two-year suspension for a doping offence will be maintained – whatever the outcome of the BOA case.

Nicholl said: "This a very different thing to the BOA by-law. This is a very clear rule we have which is entirely to do with public funding. The principle here is that public investment is a privilege and not a right, and a ban from public funding does not restrict an athlete plying their trade and competing at all events.

"It just means they cannot be a recipient of public funding via UK Sport. A two-year ban means a significant doping offence and it is then our funding principle kicks in, which is a lifetime ban from receiving public funding for sport."

Nicholl said giving public or Lottery cash to athletes who had been found guilty of serious doping offences would undermine the whole process of providing funding for Olympic sports.

She added: "It would undermine the whole of our investment if we were seen to be making any inappropriate investments, so we have to draw a line at what we feel is appropriate for having public funding.That line is where there has been a significant doping offence carrying a ban of two years or more."

The BOA is due to receive the full reasons for Wada's foundation board ruling their bylaw as being non-compliant with the anti-doping code later this week or next week.

Once those findings have been reviewed, an appeal to the Court of Arbitration for Sport in Lausanne is almost certain, with a decision expected in around three months' time.

Most of those involved in anti-doping expect the decision to go against the BOA, which would open the way for the cyclist David Millar, sprinter Dwain Chambers and shot-putter Carl Myerscough to compete at the London Olympics next summer.

Blackburn Rovers give Steve Kean pay rise but no contract extension

 

Steve Kean's contract at Blackburn Rovers, second bottom of the Premier League, is due to expire in 2013. Photograph: Carl Recine/Action Images

Steve Kean has secured a pay rise at Blackburn Rovers but the club's Indian owners have stopped short of extending the manager's contract.

Kean held talks with Venky and Balaji Rao, the brothers who co-own Blackburn, in London on Sunday. A report on Tuesday claimed the under-fire Scot had been handed a two-year extension to his deal – which is due to expire in 2013 – but Rovers have instead increased his salary to about £1.5m a year.

Blackburn said in a statement: "Following recent media speculation Blackburn Rovers FC can confirm a revision to manager Steve Kean's existing contract has been completed. An agreement made in the summer has now been formalised.

"Contrary to some reports there is no change to the length of the contract. The club respects that all contracts are private and confidential and no further comment will be made."

Speculation has suggested Kean's new terms could include a reduced compensation payment to the 44-year-old should the Blackburn board bow to supporters' pressure and sack the manager. Under his previous deal, Kean was entitled to £800,000.

Blackburn's position near the bottom of the Premier League has led to protests against Kean. The Rao brothers left Wigan's DW Stadium at half-time of Saturday's game against Blackburn to return to London, after reportedly being upset by abuse hurled towards them from a small section of the visiting support.

Bizarrely, Kean had been quoted on Tuesday claiming that he was in no rush to conclude contract negotiations. At that point, the manager said: "Yes, there have been discussions about a new contract, but I have told the owners that this is an inappropriate time to conclude any new contract discussions. Instead, the real issue is for me and everyone else to concentrate on the games.

"The fact that the owners have talked to me about a new contract means that they can see what we are building here, and we hope to make others see it too."

Cheltenham Festival hope Grands Crus impresses with Newbury victory

 

Grands Crus put in an excellent round of jumping when winning his second race over fences at Newbury on Thursday. Photograph: David Davies/PA

It was a small but dedicated crowd that turned up at Newbury on Thursday for the start of the three-day Hennessy Gold Cup meeting, rather than the thousands who will stagger away from the track after Saturday's main event, but the purists will probably reflect that they enjoyed the better part of the deal.

There are several promising types engaged in the Hennessy yet time may well prove that the best chaser on show all weekend was Grands Crus, who took the Grade Two GPG Novice Chase, the feature race on the card.

A starting price of 2-7 about David Pipe's grey, who was less than two lengths behind the outstanding Big Buck's in last year's World Hurdle at Cheltenham, suggested that this would be little more than a stress-free outing round one of the fairest and most inviting jumping tracks in the country. In the end, though, Tom Scudamore had to ask for some effort to see off the persistent challenge of Sonofvic by two lengths and the willingness with which Grands Crus responded was even more encouraging than a hard-held victory.

Grands Crus is still only six years old and there is no horse in training whose potential to reach the top in steeplechasing is more obvious.

He was generally unchanged at around 7-2 after race for the RSA Chase at the Cheltenham Festival in March but he is also top-priced at 16-1 for the Gold Cup itself, just a couple of points longer than the second-favourite, Kauto Star.

The Pipe yard lost Gloria Victis when he contested the Gold Cup as a novice for Pipe's father Martin in 2000, which may inform the discussion at Pond House over the possibility of running in the Gold Cup this season, but Scudamore still has a great deal to look forward to.

"Wherever he goes, I'll go," Scudamore said. "He's got enough speed to drop back to two-and-a-half miles, as he showed at Cheltenham [on his chasing debut] last time, but he obviously stays three miles and he'll stay further than that one day. I'm sure David will make the right decision [for Cheltenham in March], and I imagine it will be between the Jewson and the RSA.

"His jumping today was even better than at Cheltenham last time. It rode like a middling sort of a race, Sam [Twiston-Davies] was doing the right thing by going off quickly [on Viking Blond] and then pulling it back, and I don't think a year ago Grands Crus would have settled like he did. Up the straight his jumping was foot perfect.

"Obviously Sonofvic is a very good horse but it's just another step up the ladder and some of the jumps he put in felt breathtaking. Today over those last few he was up quicker than he's ever been over any fences and he jumped those better than he's jumped any other fence in the race, which just goes to show he's maturing now. Whether it's a slowly run race or a fast-run race, it doesn't make any difference to him, he's just class."

Pipe was not in attendance here but the Grade One Feltham Novice Chase at Kempton's King George VI Chase meeting on Boxing Day is likely to be the next assignment for Grands Crus and victory there would increase speculation that, with one more run behind him, he may contest the Gold Cup as the fifth race of his chasing career.

The obvious recent precedent for a young Gold Cup winner is the last one, as Long Run was having only his sixth start over British fences when he took steeplechasing's greatest prize in March. Yet he had experience over fences in France before moving to join Nicky Henderson and was in his second year over the bigger obstacles in Britain.

Time is on Grands Crus's side, though, and worries about where he will go and what price he may be can wait for another day. What matters is that he is a young and significant emerging talent and, while National Hunt racing is in good health already, no sport can have too many of those.

David Beckham in talks with Paris St-Germain, says Leonardo

 

After winning the MLS Cup with Los Angeles Galaxy David Beckham confirmed that two European clubs are interested in signing him. Photograph: Toby Canham/Getty Images

David Beckham has begun talks to join Paris St-Germain, according to the French club's sporting director, Leonardo. Beckham's Los Angeles Galaxy contract runs out at the end of next month and PSG – top of Ligue 1 after the arrival of new Qatari owners in the summer – have become the favourites to sign the former England captain.

The 36-year-old revealed after helping the Galaxy to the MLS title last weekend that he has been courted by "two big European clubs".

The former Milan manager Leonardo, who coached Beckham during the midfielder's loan spell at San Siro last year, confirmed PSG were one of those clubs. "Yes, we've spoken. These situations take time. We'll see if something suits him and suits us," Leonardo was quoted as saying in the Sun.

"I know his history and he doesn't need to tell me his past. He went to Milan and it was the same thing. There is a rapport with him. When you talk about Beckham, you're talking about something big. Now his contract is finished, he will decide his future."

PSG's interest in Beckham has been derided in some parts as a publicity stunt as the club's new owners look to cash in on his worldwide appeal. Leonardo, however, claimed Beckham could provide a key part in their push for a first French title since 1994.

"If Beckham thinks about coming, that's something we should be happy about," Leonardo said. I think he can still bring something on the pitch with the person he is and the experience he has.

"If a player like him is thinking about Paris St-Germain that's good, and we've opened the door for discussions. Everybody's talking about PSG and that pleases me. PSG are on the up, there are 45,000 people in the stadium and everyone's happy."

Spurs lawyers received Karren Brady phone records in March, court told

 

The row over the Olympic stadium and Karren Brady's phone records continues in the high court. Photograph: Westfield Group/PA Wire/PA

The illegally acquired phone records of West Ham United's vice-chair, Karren Brady, were passed to Tottenham Hotspur's lawyers in early March, it has emerged, although the club continues to argue that it did not receive copies itself and had no use for them in any case.

At a high court hearing on Wednesday lawyers for Brady and West Ham won an order requiring accountants PKF, hired by Spurs to conduct "due diligence" on the acrimonious bidding process for the Olympic Stadium, to hand over "unlawfully obtained" copies of Brady's itemised phone bills.

Justice Coulson said that "in a meeting on March 4 2011, a copy of the records was provided to Olswang, legal advisers to Tottenham Hotspur". The meeting took place around three weeks after the Olympic Park Legacy Company had awarded the Olympic Stadium to West Ham following an acrimonious bidding process.

Olswang was gathering material for a possible judicial review, which eventually reached court in October but was then halted in its tracks when the government and the OPLC pulled the plug on their deal with West Ham and Newham council in the face of delays caused by legal challenges from Spurs and Leyton Orient.

Although their lawyers held a copy of the records, Spurs maintain that they were not passed on to the club and that directors had no use for them in any case, because they were aware that contact between OPLC board members and bidders was encouraged under the tender process. The records are believed to show details of phone calls between Brady and OPLC board members, including the chief executive Andrew Altman.

In his witness statement the Spurs finance director Matthew Collecott said: "I understand [DKF partner Howard] Hill produced Brady's phone records to Olswang. When asked he confirmed they had been received anonymously. Olswang confirm they made it clear to Mr Hill it was imperative that all investigations were carried out within the law."

According to Coulson, Collecott confirmed that PKF was engaged in February to carry out "due diligence" on the process. Spurs were concerned details of their tender for the Olympic Stadium had been leaked.

West Ham's counsel, Ben Jaffey, said his reading of Collecott's desciption of the sequence of the events was that Hill was being painted as a "rogue agent" who had "exceeded his authority". Both PKF and Hill claim not to know where the phone bills came from, saying they had been sent anonymously.

"I did not attach any significance to Howard Hill's reference to receiving telephone records," said Collecott. "In any event they would have been of absolutely no relevance to me because I (and indeed any other director) was entitled to call OPLC board members and so was Ms Brady. Telephone contact between the bidders and members of the OPLC was actually encouraged under the rules applicable to the bid, as anyone who is part of the process would realise."

The case notes outline how an individual calling themselves "Thomas Brady" with a fictional West Ham email address had managed to obtain Brady's itemised Vodafone mobile phone bills from its customer services department.

Jaffey said that PKF claimed not to know where the documents had come from and said that its partner Howard Hill had claimed the telephone records arrived "in the proverbial brown envelope".

Spurs strongly deny they had any part in the acquisition of the telephone records, or subsequently saw them, or had any interest in doing so while PKF claim the documents were sent to them anonymously.

Howard Hill, a PKF partner, has admitted passing the records to the Sunday Times, which used them as part of the basis for an article in June. Hill apologised to the Spurs chairman, Daniel Levy, after the Sunday Times article appeared, the court was told.

Last week, the judge had described how West Ham and Brady were given the "traditional runaround" by Spurs and PKF as they attempted to establish whether the phone bills existed and who had access to them. According to the agreement reached on Wednesday, PKF must supply Brady and West Ham copies of the phone records and any documents based on the information contained therein.

Lee Westwood targets Players Championship after rejoining PGA Tour

 

The world No3 Lee Westwood will divide his time between Europe and America next year after deciding to rejoin the PGA Tour in 2012.

The move will see Westwood compete in the Players Championship at Sawgrass, which he did not contest this year due to scheduling complications, and attempt to qualify for the play-offs and FedEx Cup for the first time.

"I missed the Players Championship last year when watching it on television," Westwood said. "It was always a scheduling issue for me. Though the rules changed, making it exempt from PGA Tour restrictions, I had already set my schedule for later in the year in Asia. I didn't want to break any of those commitments.

"It's a great event and one I've always enjoyed playing. It just felt right in Ryder Cup year to commit to a full programme in the United States.

"The FedEx Cup looked pretty good on TV this year. I thought it would be great to give it a go, having never taken part."

Westwood's first tournament in America will be the Accenture World Match Play in Arizona in February. He is obliged to play at least 15 events in the United States.

Lewis Hamilton looks on bright side and embraces his year of growth

 

Lewis Hamilton said the Brazilian Grand Prix is almost like the first race of the season or at least the beginning of what is to come. Photograph: Nacho Doce/Reuters

For Lewis Hamilton brave new dawns have too often turned out to be yet more dusks but there was an air of serenity about him here on Thursday as he arrived wearing a diamond-encrusted rosary given to him by his former girlfriend Nicole Scherzinger with whom, he said, he had been having reconciliatory meetings.

As he prepared for Sunday's final grand prix of the season at the Interlagos circuit, where he won his world championship in 2008, the McLaren driver said: "This is almost like the first race of the season or at least this is the beginning of what's to come.

"I was talking to a friend just recently, who is very wise, and I said it's been a very difficult year. He said: 'It's not been a difficult year, it's been a year of growth,' which I thought was one of the most positive things I have learned this year. It really has been a year where I've just grown. I've learned a lot from it and I can take it to next year.

"So I feel positive about it and in the future I'll look back on this season and smile and say: 'I needed that.' I feel I'm now absolutely prepared for the championship challenge next season, and for me the preparation for it starts from here. Next year is going to be an interesting one I think."

As if this season had not been interesting enough. It has been marked by crashes with rivals and clashes with stewards and his mind, clearly, was in turmoil for most of the summer. But he drove thrillingly in South Korea last month and again in Abu Dhabi 11 days ago to record his third win of the season. "I am very happy to be here," he said. "I've great memories of being here in the past. Actually she [Scherzinger] was here with me when I won the world championship.

"It is not that I feel different, it is the way I am approaching it. The new season starts here. I had a good race in Abu Dhabi with things going in the right direction, so it starts from now. I don't have to wait for next season."

Despite some recent negative pictures of himself with Scherzinger he said: "You didn't catch us at the best of times. But what you didn't see is that we had a really good week.

"We had a couple of really nice lunches together and that day we had a really nice dinner. Unfortunately you didn't get any nice pictures of coming out of that. It is still very early days. We still have very, very strong feelings for each other and I still love her very much. Who knows, maybe we will be together in the future."

Roger Federer stays cool to shrug off Mardy Fish and burnout talk

Roger Federer stays cool to shrug off Mardy Fish and talk of burnout | Sport | The Guardian

Roger Federer aimed a thinly veiled attack at the injured Andy Murray, whose world No3 spot he will take if he reaches Sunday’s final. Photograph: Anthony Devlin/PA

Roger Federer stands alone, again – naturally. In the space of a few days by the banks of the Thames the Swiss has reminded his weary peers as well as sniping doubters that 30 is a number no more significant than 6-1, 3-6, 6-3, the ones he put on struggling Mardy Fish on Thursday by way of limbering up for the semi-finals of the Barclay's ATP World Tour Finals, the game's last proving ground of the season.

After a third round-robin match, of no significance, he subtly deconstructed what he regards as the myth of burnout, an issue that has consumed others to the point of rebellion but has left him singularly unimpressed. As most of the seven others who started this tournament ruminate on their past bruises and more to come, il gran signore shrugs.

"My body, even if it's injured," he said earlier in the week, "can still play really well, whereas maybe other players, if they are injured, it doesn't work any more." It was the most unsubtle dig at Andy Murray, who had left the tournament on Tuesday with a groin strain.

At the moment Federer is floating above a sea of tennis turmoil. He has 20 gears and needed perhaps half of them to beat Fish, the 29-year-old American with nothing to lose and nothing to win, as he had already failed twice in the round-robin series. Homesick Mardy had his parents, Sally and Tom, in the stands but the American was a long way from home on Thanksgiving Day and a similar distance behind Federer at the end.

Fish won 93% of his first serves; the previous night David Ferrer's numbers against Novak Djokovic were similarly impressive: 92. Clearly, to compete with the best, players need to have their serve cranked to near-perfection.

But Federer remains the master of court manipulation, whatever the strength of his opponent's serve. When Fish served at 2-5 to stay in the match he was nowhere near as cool under pressure as Federer had been in a similar situation in the second set half an hour earlier, but he hung on. In the end he looked happy to be in the presence of a player whose gifts are so great their diminution is, for the moment, barely discernible.

After his calm demolition of Fish in an hour and 47 minutes Federer expanded on his thesis that the game is panicking for no reason.

"Next year's season is going to be shortened by two weeks," he said when asked if the season was too long. "That's as much as we can squeeze it, otherwise a lot of tournaments would have to go – or we would have four tournaments the same week, which I don't think is a very smart idea.

"The whole boycott thing [as mentioned by Murray, Rafael Nadal and Andy Roddick at the US Open], it's nonsense. The season's always been long, tough and gruelling. Maybe it's more physical. But I've played 10 years straight, 60-plus matches [a year], if not 90 at times. It's about how you manage your schedule."

So, no sympathy for Djokovic, the world No1, whose tired legs betrayed his ennui in a straight-sets defeat by Ferrer in an hour and 15 minutes the night before.

From ennui to Henry, then. Federer spent the evening away from the torture chamber in Greenwich watching Arsenal with his old friend, Thierry, and revealed the French player had begged him to come to the Emirates. "I said: 'Just let me try to beat Rafa first. If I'm through in the group, there's a good chance I'll come.'"

He went. "I'd ask him a question, why would they play this way, why did they do that, what does that player do well? He can explain all these things. He's like a manager. I was able to go down on the pitch, go in the locker room, meet the players. They were extremely happy." As they should be.

It was only the second match he has seen live in England, after England v Argentina at Wembley 11 years ago. May he soon have more time for Mirka [Federer's wife] and the twins, or are there goals left? "I guess I do play a bit for the legacy and the history, the record books. But it's really the press that remind me of most things. I just go along with it. I have no intentions to quit."

If Federer reaches Sunday's final, he will take back the No3 spot he surrendered to Murray on the Scot's exhilarating run in Asia. If he does not, it will be a surprise given the quality of his tennis this week.

If he wins his sixth title? Well, his vast army of fans will be encouraged to believe in the second coming of Roger. Is he excited about getting back to No3? As you might expect from someone who was No1 for so many years, no. "It doesn't mean the world to me," he said. But Federer still means a lot to the world of tennis.

Roger Federer stays cool to shrug off Mardy Fish and burnout talk

 

Roger Federer aimed a thinly veiled attack at the injured Andy Murray, whose world No3 spot he will take if he reaches Sunday’s final. Photograph: Anthony Devlin/PA

Roger Federer stands alone, again – naturally. In the space of a few days by the banks of the Thames the Swiss has reminded his weary peers as well as sniping doubters that 30 is a number no more significant than 6-1, 3-6, 6-3, the ones he put on struggling Mardy Fish on Thursday by way of limbering up for the semi-finals of the Barclay's ATP World Tour Finals, the game's last proving ground of the season.

After a third round-robin match, of no significance, he subtly deconstructed what he regards as the myth of burnout, an issue that has consumed others to the point of rebellion but has left him singularly unimpressed. As most of the seven others who started this tournament ruminate on their past bruises and more to come, il gran signore shrugs.

"My body, even if it's injured," he said earlier in the week, "can still play really well, whereas maybe other players, if they are injured, it doesn't work any more." It was the most unsubtle dig at Andy Murray, who had left the tournament on Tuesday with a groin strain.

At the moment Federer is floating above a sea of tennis turmoil. He has 20 gears and needed perhaps half of them to beat Fish, the 29-year-old American with nothing to lose and nothing to win, as he had already failed twice in the round-robin series. Homesick Mardy had his parents, Sally and Tom, in the stands but the American was a long way from home on Thanksgiving Day and a similar distance behind Federer at the end.

Fish won 93% of his first serves; the previous night David Ferrer's numbers against Novak Djokovic were similarly impressive: 92. Clearly, to compete with the best, players need to have their serve cranked to near-perfection.

But Federer remains the master of court manipulation, whatever the strength of his opponent's serve. When Fish served at 2-5 to stay in the match he was nowhere near as cool under pressure as Federer had been in a similar situation in the second set half an hour earlier, but he hung on. In the end he looked happy to be in the presence of a player whose gifts are so great their diminution is, for the moment, barely discernible.

After his calm demolition of Fish in an hour and 47 minutes Federer expanded on his thesis that the game is panicking for no reason.

"Next year's season is going to be shortened by two weeks," he said when asked if the season was too long. "That's as much as we can squeeze it, otherwise a lot of tournaments would have to go – or we would have four tournaments the same week, which I don't think is a very smart idea.

"The whole boycott thing [as mentioned by Murray, Rafael Nadal and Andy Roddick at the US Open], it's nonsense. The season's always been long, tough and gruelling. Maybe it's more physical. But I've played 10 years straight, 60-plus matches [a year], if not 90 at times. It's about how you manage your schedule."

So, no sympathy for Djokovic, the world No1, whose tired legs betrayed his ennui in a straight-sets defeat by Ferrer in an hour and 15 minutes the night before.

From ennui to Henry, then. Federer spent the evening away from the torture chamber in Greenwich watching Arsenal with his old friend, Thierry, and revealed the French player had begged him to come to the Emirates. "I said: 'Just let me try to beat Rafa first. If I'm through in the group, there's a good chance I'll come.'"

He went. "I'd ask him a question, why would they play this way, why did they do that, what does that player do well? He can explain all these things. He's like a manager. I was able to go down on the pitch, go in the locker room, meet the players. They were extremely happy." As they should be.

It was only the second match he has seen live in England, after England v Argentina at Wembley 11 years ago. May he soon have more time for Mirka [Federer's wife] and the twins, or are there goals left? "I guess I do play a bit for the legacy and the history, the record books. But it's really the press that remind me of most things. I just go along with it. I have no intentions to quit."

If Federer reaches Sunday's final, he will take back the No3 spot he surrendered to Murray on the Scot's exhilarating run in Asia. If he does not, it will be a surprise given the quality of his tennis this week.

If he wins his sixth title? Well, his vast army of fans will be encouraged to believe in the second coming of Roger. Is he excited about getting back to No3? As you might expect from someone who was No1 for so many years, no. "It doesn't mean the world to me," he said. But Federer still means a lot to the world of tennis.

Sachin Tendulkar edges closer to 100th international century for India

 

Sachin Tendulkar will resume the third Test against West Indies 33 runs short of becoming the first man to record 100 international centuries after leading the Indian fightback on day three in Mumbai. Tendulkar finished on 67 not out and will be optimistic of reaching a famous milestone when he resumes alongside VVS Laxman.

India, who have already won the three-Test series as they lead 2-0, were 281 for three at the close, trailing by 309 runs after West Indies were dismissed for 590 in their first innings.

Tendulkar's quest for his 100th international century overshadowed the efforts of his team-mate Rahul Dravid, who became only the second player to pass 13,000 Test runs – after Tendulkar – on his way to a lively 82. Tendulkar and Dravid were joined in making half-centuries by Gautam Gambhir (55). Virender Sehwag (37) and the unbeaten Laxman (32 not out) made decent contributions to the cause as the Indian top order prospered.

Sehwag was the first victim of the India innings after he and fellow opener Gambhir initially got their side off to a flyer in a 67-run stand. Sehwag was typically belligerent, but just as he looked set to exact further damage Darren Sammy struck, sending an off-cutter into Sehwag's middle stump just before lunch.

Gambhir was removed on 55 having earlier been dropped by Kirk Edwards in the slips. He finally walked in the 34th over when he edged Ravi Rampaul to Carlton Baugh. Gambhir's removal brought Tendulkar to the crease to the delight of the crowd, but it was Dravid who drew the adulation after his driven half-volley ran away for a boundary and took him past the 13,000-run threshold.

Dravid went on to reach the tea interval unbeaten on 52, racking up his 62nd Test 50, and began the evening session in similarly determined fashion. But one ball after flashing away his 11th boundary of the match he came unstuck when a Marlon Samuels delivery pitched up and clipped off-stump.

With Dravid's century bid out of the way, the focus switched to Tendulkar, who had already signalled his intentions with a towering six early in the evening session and was soon celebrating his 63rd Test 50. Tendulkar hit only one more boundary after passing 50, instead pacing himself to stumps. He did get lucky on 58, when the close-in Baugh failed to clasp a thick edge off Devendra Bishoo, although it would have been an unfortunate dismissal – and a huge anti-climax for the vocal Mumbai support.

Earlier, Ravichandran Ashwin had completed a five-wicket haul by claiming the final wicket India had needed at the start of play. Ashwin bowled last man Bishoo to finish with five for 156, his second five-wicket haul in only his third Test.

Chelsea mull over building new stadium on Battersea power station site

  • Sport
  • Football
  • Chelsea

Chelsea mull over building new stadium on Battersea power station site

• It is prudent to look at the site again, say Chelsea
• Architectural firm hired to draw plans for 60,000-seat venue

  • guardian.co.uk, Thursday 24 November 2011 18.17 GMT
  • Article history
  • battersea power station
    Chelsea say the time has come again to explore their options and that includes the Battersea power station site. Photograph: Oli Scarff/Getty Images

    Chelsea have appointed a leading developer to explore the feasibility of building a new stadium at the site of Battersea power station on the south bank of the Thames.

    The Premier League club have yet to buy back the land upon which their current home is built from Chelsea Pitch Owners plc (CPO) – a company founded in 1993 to safeguard the then financially vulnerable London club's future at Stamford Bridge. Chelsea would need to secure the freehold and sell that site before they would be in a financial position to switch to a new ground.

    Yet the club have appointed Mike Hussey, chief executive of Almacantar, as their development partner to ensure they would not miss out should the area in Battersea emerge as the most viable option if they do indeed choose to relocate.

    The architectural firm Kohn Pedersen Fox has been hired to draw up plans for the potential construction of an arena that would house between 55,000 and 60,000 spectators, to be situated to the south-east of the Grade II listed power station, with commercial operations such as hotels and shops to be housed within the building. Any plans would have to be passed by Wandsworth council.

    A Chelsea spokesman said: "In the past, we've talked to various people with interests in Battersea power station but we haven't had any substantive discussions with anyone regarding that site for several months. However, in light of current developments, we now think it prudent to look again at the feasibility and potential for the Battersea power station site to be developed for a football stadium.

    "We have made no decision to leave Stamford Bridge and we continue to discuss with the local council any economically viable options to expand the Bridge, but we will continue to investigate various options close to Stamford Bridge."

    Interest is maintained in land at the northern end of Earl's Court, whose owner, Capital & Counties plc, is pursuing residential and commercial developments of the site, while White City, near the home of Queens Park Rangers, is another potential area.

    The new instruction issued to Almacantar, a development firm set up by Hussey with backing from Italy's Agnelli family, will add further intrigue to the complicated negotiations already surrounding the future of the power station. The site, owned by Real Estate Opportunities (REO) – itself largely owned by Treasury Holdings of Ireland – has been empty for nearly two decades. REO has been attempting to attract an equity investor for a year to fund a proposed £5.5bn redevelopment, yet the site is already saddled with around £300m of debt owed to Lloyds Banking Group and Ireland's National Asset Management Agency. That debt can be called in at any time.

    SP Setia, a Malaysian investor, has apparently offered to buy the senior debt for £255m at 85p in the pound, though agreement has yet to be reached between Lloyds and NAMA over those proposals. It is in that climate that Chelsea have formalised their interest in the area, though there is an acceptance that the club must seek to secure the freehold of Stamford Bridge if they are realistically to move to a new home.

    Shareholders in CPO rejected the club's proposals to buy back the pitch, the turnstiles and the land on which the stadium's four stands are built at an extraordinary general meeting last month. Chelsea are considering how best to revisit that issue, though no new proposals are anticipated at CPO's annual general meeting, which has been put back to January following a reshaping of the company's board.

    A concerted campaign had been conducted by CPO shareholders aimed at blocking Chelsea's plans – something achieved relatively comfortably at the EGM – with concerns subsequently raised by the Say No CPO group (SNCPO) over the bulk sale of shares once the club had made their proposals public. Solicitors working for SNCPO wrote to the Takeover Panel earlier this month expressing those worries, though the independent body has since indicated that no investigation is to be carried out.

    A spokesperson for SNCPO added: "Given that Battersea power station falls within the three-mile radius as originally set out in the recent proposal put by Chelsea FC to Chelsea Pitch Owners, Say No CPO welcome the club's potential interest in purchasing the site, as well as their continued efforts to explore options regarding the expansion of Stamford Bridge. We are, however, disappointed that the club did not take the opportunity of the EGM on 27 October to make their intentions clearer with regard to any potential relocation sites."

Milan may offer Carlos Tevez an escape route from Manchester City

 

The Manchester City striker Carlos Tevez, pictured with one of his daughters after arriving in Buenos Aires last month, is refusing to return to Manchester and face disciplinary proceedings. Photograph: Stringer Afghanistan Admin/Reuters

Carlos Tevez could be offered the chance to resurrect his career at Milan after initial talks about offering him a potential escape route from Manchester City.

Kia Joorabchian, Tevez's adviser, flew to Italy on Thursday and spoke at length to the Milan vice-president, Adriano Galliani, and the sporting director, Ariedo Braida, in a prearranged meeting at the club's head office.

Milan must now decide whether to propose a deal that will persuade City to allow Tevez, currently on strike in Argentina, to end his occasionally successful and frequently controversial spell at the club.

The Serie A side will almost certainly fail if their intention is to propose a loan for the man who shared last season's Premier League Golden Boot award, with 20 goals, but is in his third week of being awol and appears to have no plans to return.

One report in Italy talks of Milan offering €5m (£4.3m) to take Tevez until the end of the season, followed by a €20m agreement in June. City, however, want a straight sale as they seek to off-load a player who has become a pariah in Manchester because of the issues surrounding him at City and, formerly, Manchester United.

The Premier League leaders are also determined to get something approaching Tevez's true market value despite appreciating that the breakdown in his relations with the club may have severely affected the amount potential buyers are willing to pay. Italy appears to represent Tevez's best hope, with Internazionale and Juventus also known admirers, and a deal potentially out of the reach of the leading South American clubs. They, in particular, will be affected by City's stance that a loan move will not be entertained.

Tevez is still receiving a weekly salary of around £250,000 despite flying back to Buenos Aires on 8 November without the club's permission and defying their orders to return and face disciplinary proceedings. City are considering every option, including legal action, but will not discuss the details until the situation is resolved.

Tevez's last public appearance suggested he was not particularly missing being part of Roberto Mancini's squad. He teamed up with the golfers Sebastián Fernández and Andrés Romero to win the Buenos Aires grand prix, a tournament for professionals and amateurs. Asked about Tevez's state of mind, Fernández said: "He did not say anything about his problems with his club, but I was struck by the peace he had. And he plays golf very well."

Rob Andrew says he will not resign as RFU chaos deepens at Twickenham

Rob Andrew said he would not resign from his post with the RFU. Photograph: Richard Sellers/Sportsphoto/Sportsphoto Ltd/Allstar

Rob Andrew has insisted that he would not step down from his role at Twickenham as the fallout from England's disastrous World Cup continued to increase the pressure upon him.

While he conceded that English rugby has hit "rock bottom", the elite rugby director again distanced himself from direct responsibility for events in New Zealand and rejected calls for his resignation. Andrew said that he was "absolutely shattered" by recent events and should have done more to help Martin Johnson during the latter's time as England team manager. Despite howls from within the English game, however, he maintained he would not be stepping down. "No, I am not going to resign. If other people choose to make a decision that will be taken out of my hands."

But the pressure has never been greater as English rugby plumbed new shambolic depths on a day when:

• Brian Smith resigned as the England attack coach.

• The former England captain Martin Corry revealed that Johnson quit last week because of a lack of support from leading RFU officials.

• It emerged that there would be no immediate decision on Mike Tindall's appeal against his £25,000 fine and removal from the elite player squad.

• A number of former England players questioned the lack of leadership at the union.

• The former All Black wing and Italy and Japan coach John Kirwan said it would be "an honour" to succeed Johnson as England manager.

Smith's decision not to seek a renewal of his contract – he was appointed in July 2008 – was not a massive surprise, given the heavy criticism within the leaked post-World Cup player interviews published this week. The circumstances surrounding Johnson's resignation, though, are becoming clearer. Corry, a former Leicester team-mate of Johnson, said: "There has been a distinct lack of leadership from the RFU, particularly since the World Cup. Instead they just stayed quiet and let Johno take all the shit.

"He won't say it because he's too much of a man but it forced his hand. He said: 'I'm going to have to do the right thing and resign.' That's how he felt. It's left England in limbo. It could have been very different if people at the RFU had been prepared to stick their heads above the parapet."

It must be questionable whether Johnson could have survived Twickileaks, the blizzard of criticisms made by players during the post-World Cup review process that have been leaked, but Andrew's position continues to look precarious. While his role does encompass more than just the national team, he has now widely perceived as an impediment to radical change at Twickenham, regardless of the identity of Johnson's successor. "He will make sure everyone else is accountable and will do everything he can to keep his job," the former England scrum-half Austin Healey told ESPN.

Andrew, nevertheless, is standing firm. "Of course I've considered my position," he said. "There's been soul-searching the whole time, it's been a pretty tough 12 months for everybody here, there's a lot of stuff going on that shouldn't have been. But I don't have to resign. Other people may have that point of view if they want but there are lots of things going on here. I run a big department and I have to find a new head coach."

He described as "despicable" the leaking of confidential comments made by England players. "Whoever's leaked it, I hope they're found and action is taken. The review process has been betrayed and that's unacceptable. But you have to put the comments in context. When you get anonymous information like this, you have a huge responsibility to deal with that information correctly because you are putting people's reputations and lives at risk here. Players gave those views on the understanding they would be strictly anonymous. It's the lowest of the low to leak this sort of information."

The next crisis facing the RFU depends on Tindall's appeal. The hearing was moved to a secret location and it is possible the RFU's acting and outgoing chief executive, Martyn Thomas, will not give the verdict until Monday. Tindall is appealing the RFU's decision to fine him £25,000 for his conduct relating to a drunken night out in Queenstown during the World Cup. The 33-year-old was also dropped from the England squad following an RFU investigation that was conducted by Andrew and the legal officer Karena Vleck. The Rugby Players' Association called Tindall's fine "extraordinary" and "unprecendented". If the verdict were to be overturned it would add significantly to Andrew's problems.

Wednesday 16 November 2011

Is it permissible to sell pure silk?

 

In Question number 164 on the ruling of selling wine to non-muslims Sheikh has quoted to be said:  "Verily when Allah forbids something, He forbids its price."

I have a service which anyone can subscribe by sending email to:  XXXX  in the body of the message subscribe ahad This service sends one hadith a day, english translation, from Sahih Al-Bukhari.  Here's what they have sent me: 

Bukhari Vol 8; no. 11

Narrated by Ibn Umar (Radhiallaho Anho):  My father, seeing a silken cloak being sold, said, "O Allah's Apostle! Buy this and wear it on Fridays and when the foreign delegates pay a visit to you."  He said, "This is worn only by that person who will have no share in the Hereafter."  Later a few silken cloaks were given to the Prophet (Sallahllaahu 'alaihi wasallam) as a gift, and he sent one of those cloaks to Umar.  Umar said (to the Prophet), "How can I wear it while you have said about it what you said?"  The Prophet (Sallallaahu 'alaihi wasallam) said, "I did not give it to you to wear but to sell or to give to someone else to wear."  So Umar sent it to his (pagan) brother who was from the inhabitants of Mecca before he (Umar's brohter) embraced Islam.

From the hadith quoted above it seems like it is permissible to sell it or to give it to non-Muslims. 

Praise be to Allaah. 

 We constantly advise people, when reading
texts that appear to present a problem, to examine all versions and
isnaads of these ahaadeeth, and to refer to the words of scholars and
commentators, because they have the knowledge and understanding that
can dispel the confusion.  In the following discussion we will
quote several versions of the hadeeth as reported by al-Bukhaari (may
Allaah have mercy on him), then we will give a summary from the commentary
on the hadeeth by al-Haafiz Ahmad ibn ‘Ali ibn Hajar al-‘Asqallaani
(may Allaah have mercy on him) from his book Fath
al-Baari Sharh Saheeh al-Bukhaari, and from the commentary
of Imam al-Nawawi (may Allaah have mercy on him) on the same hadeeth
in Saheeh Muslim.  

‘Abd-Allaah ibn ‘Umar reported that ‘Umar ibn al-Khattaab
saw a hullah siyara’ [a type of two-piece garment] at the door of the
mosque and said, “O Messenger of Allaah, why don’t you buy this and
wear it on Fridays and when the delegations come to you?”  The
Messenger of Allaah (peace and
blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: “This is only worn by one who
has no share in the Hereafter.” Then the Messenger of Allaah
(peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) was brought a number of
garments [hullahs] of the same type. He gave one of them to ‘Umar ibn
al-Khattaab (may Allaah be pleased with him) and ‘Umar said, “O Messenger
of Allaah, are you giving it to me to wear it when you said what you
said about the hullah of ‘Utaarid (the vendor of the first hullah)?” 
The Messenger of Allaah (peace
and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: “I am not giving it to you
to wear it.”  So ‘Umar ibn al-Khattaab (may Allaah be pleased with
him) gave it to a brother of his in Makkah who was a mushrik.” 
(Saheeh al-Bukhaari, 837). 

According
to another report: “[The Prophet
(peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said:] Sell it and benefit
from its price.” Al-Bukhaari, 896.

 According to another report: “I did
not send it to you for you to wear it, for it is worn only by one who
has no share in the Hereafter. I sent it to you so that you could benefit
from it – i.e., by selling it.”  Al-Bukhaari, 1962. 

According to another report: “Umar said: ‘How can I wear
it when you said what you said about it?’   He said, ‘I did
not give it to you for you to wear it; sell it or give it to someone
else.’  So ‘Umar sent it to a brother of his among the people of
Makkah, before he [the brother] became Muslim.”  Al-Bukhaari, 2426.

 According to another report: “He said:
‘Sell it and spend the money on your own needs.’”  Al-Bukhaari,
2826. 

According to another report: “He said: ‘I sent it to
you so that you could make some money from it.’”  Al-Bukhaari,
5617.

 Ibn Hajar (may Allaah have mercy on
him) said: 

“Concerning the phrase, ‘Why don’t you buy it and wear
it?’ – it is as if ‘Umar wanted the Prophet
(peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) to buy it and wished that
he would do so. ‘This is only worn’ – according to the report of Jareer
ibn Haazim, he said, ‘silk is only worn’.  ‘One who has no share’
– Maalik added in his report, ‘in the Hereafter.’  This could mean
the one who has no share in the Hereafter, i.e., of silk clothes. 

‘He gave it to him’ – it is apparent from the rest of
the hadeeth that he did not give it to him to wear, or it could mean
that he gave him something that could be used for clothing. [The verb
used, kasaa, has the sense of covering or clothing].  According
to the report of Maalik, ‘Then the Messenger of Allaah
(peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) was brought a number of
similar hullahs, and he gave one to ‘Umar.’ In another report, ‘Later
on some hullahs (of the same type) were brought to the Messenger of
Allaah (peace and blessings of
Allaah be upon him), and he sent one to ‘Umar and one to Usaamah ibn
Zayd, and gave one to ‘Ali ibn Abi Taalib.’

 ‘Sell it and spend the money on your
own needs’ – means benefit from its price, or it could mean trade it
or exchange it, or some more general meaning. 

(Note): the reason why this hadeeth was included in Baab
al-Hareer li’l-nisa’ (Chapter on silk for women) is because
the Prophet (peace and blessings
of Allaah be upon him) said to ‘Umar, ‘sell it or use it for clothing.’
Silk is forbidden for men, and there is no difference between ‘Umar
and other men in that regard, so the permission to give it to someone
else to wear applies only if it is given to a woman.  The fact
that ‘Umar gave it to his brother should not be a source of confusion
to those who believe that the minor issues of sharee’ah apply to kaafirs
too, as ‘Umar gave it to his brother to sell it or to give it to a woman
to wear.

 In some versions of the hadeeth… Ibn
‘Umar said: ‘The Messenger of Allaah
(peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) saw ‘Utaarid wearing a silk
garment and he disliked that for him, then he gave ‘Umar a similar garment…’ 
and ‘… [he said,] “I did not give it to you to wear it, I gave it to
you to give to women to wear.”’  This is an indication that it
is permissible for women to wear pure silk.  

Imaam Muslim (may Allaah have mercy on him) reported
in his Saheeh that Jaabir ibn ‘Abd-Allaah (may Allaah be pleased with
him) said: ‘The Prophet (peace
and blessings of Allaah be upon him) one day wore a coat of silk brocade
that had been given to him, but soon afterwards he took it off and sent
it to ‘Umar ibn al-Khattaab.  It was said to him, “But you took
it off so quickly, O Messenger of Allaah.” He said, “Jibreel forbade
me to wear it.”  Then ‘Umar came to him, weeping, and said, “O
Messenger of Allaah, you disliked something and gave it to me. What
is wrong with me?”  He said, “I did not give it to you to wear
it, I gave it to you to sell it.” So he sold it for two thousand dirhams.’ 
(Reported by Muslim, 3861).” 

Al-Nawawi (may Allaah have mercy on him) said
in his commentary on Saheeh Muslim:

 “In the hadeeth of ‘Umar about this
hullah there is evidence that silk is forbidden for men and permitted
for women, that it is permissible to give it, that its price is permitted,
and that a Muslim is permitted to give a kaafir clothes and other things.

 ‘So ‘Umar gave it to a mushrik brother
of his in Makkah’ – this is how it was reported by al-Bukhaari and Muslim.
According to a report narrated by al-Bukhaari in some chapter, ‘‘Umar
sent it to a brother of his among the people of Makkah, before he [the
brother] became Muslim’ – this indicates that he (the brother) subsequently
became Muslim… This also indicates that it is permissible to maintain
family ties with kaafirs and to treat them well, and that it is permissible
to give gifts to kaafirs.  The permission to give silk clothes
to men does not mean that they should wear them. Some may misinterpret
this to mean that kaafir men are permitted to wear silk, but this is
incorrect. The hadeeth describes giving a gift to a kaafir, but does
not give them permission to wear silk.  The Prophet
(peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) sent silk garments to ‘Umar,
‘Ali and Usaamah (may Allaah be pleased with them), but this does not
mean that they were permitted to wear silk; he stated quite clearly
that he was giving it to them so that they could benefit from it in
some way other than by wearing it.  The correct opinion, which
is that of the majority of scholars, is that the minor issues of sharee’ah
apply equally to kaafirs, so they are forbidden to wear silk just as
Muslims are. And Allaah knows best.

 Al-Bukhaari (may Allaah have mercy on
him) reported another hadeeth on the same issue from al-Miswar ibn Makhramah,
who said that his father Makhramah said to him: ‘O my son, I have heard
that the Messenger of Allaah (peace
and blessings of Allaah be upon him) has received some coats and he
is sharing them out, so let us go to him.’  So we went and found
the Prophet (peace and blessings
of Allaah be upon him) in his house. [My father] said to me, ‘O my son,
call the Prophet (peace and blessings
of Allaah be upon him) for me.’ I felt too embarrassed, so I said, ‘Should
I call the Messenger of Allaah
(peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) for you?’ He said, ‘O my
son, he is not arrogant.’ So I called him, and he came out carrying
a coat of silk brocade with gold buttons. He said, ‘O Makhramah, we
kept this for you,’ and he gave it to him. (Reported by al-Bukhaari,
Kitaab al-Libaas, Baab al-Muzarrar
bi’l-Dhahab).

 Ibn Hajar (may Allaah have mercy on
him) said in his commentary on the hadeeth:

 “ ‘He came out carrying a coat of silk
brocade with gold buttons’ – it is possible that this happened before
silk was prohibited, but after silk and gold were prohibited for men,
this report can no longer be used as evidence by those who want to permit
these things.  It is also possible that this happened after these
things were prohibited, in which case the garment was given so that
the recipient could benefit from it either by selling it or by giving
it to women to wear.”

 In brief, then, the answer to the matter
raised in the question is that so long as a silk garment has some legitimate
use, such as clothing for women, then it is permissible to sell it and
take the money paid for it.  And Allaah knows best. May Allaah
bless our Prophet Muhammad.

What are the two holy places?

 

what are two holy places ?

Praise be to Allaah.

Ibn Taymiyah (may Allaah have mercy on him) said:

“There is no holy place (Haram) on earth, not Bayt al-Maqdis
(Jerusalem) or anywhere else, apart from these two holy places (i.e., Makkah and
Madeenah). No other place should be called Haram (sanctuary, holy place), as the ignorant
speak of Haram al-Maqdis (Jerusalem) or Haram al-Khaleel (in Khaleel, Palestine), for
these places and others are not Harams, according to the consensus of the Muslims…
There is no dispute among the Muslims concerning any third holy place apart from Dujj,
which is a valley in al-Taa’if…”

(Majmoo’ al-Fataawa, 26/118).

Shaykh Ibn ‘Uthaymeen confirmed that this (Dujj) is
not a holy place. (al-Sharh al-Mumti’, 7/248).

Is it permissible to say that a particular person is one of the awliya’ (close friends) of Allaah?

 

Is it permissible to say that a particular person is a wali or close friend of Allaah because of his righteousness and piety, whether he is living or dead, such as saying for example, The scholar so and so is one of the awliya’ of Allaah?.

Praise be to Allaah.
 

 

Allaah has mentioned the signs by which His close friends or awliya’ may be known.
They are: faith (eemaan) and piety (taqwa). Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning): 

“No doubt! Verily, the Awliyaa’ of Allaah, no fear shall come upon them nor
shall they grieve.

Those who believed, and used to fear Allaah much (by abstaining from evil deeds
and sins and by doing righteous deeds)”

[Yoonus 10:62-63] 

But it is not possible to be certain that a particular individual is one of the awliya’ of
Allaah, because achieving true faith and piety are matters of the heart that are hidden, and people cannot find out about them. Hence it is
possible to think that someone is likely to be a wali, but it is impossible to be certain. 

Shaykh Ibn ‘Uthaymeen (may Allaah have mercy on him) said: 

All Muslims should measure the deeds of those who are claimed to be awliya’ by
that which is in the Qur’aan and Sunnah. If they are in accordance with the Qur’aan and Sunnah, then we hope that he is one of the awliya’ or
close friends of Allaah, but if they go against the Qur’aan and Sunnah, then he is not one of the awliya’ of Allaah. Allaah has mentioned in His
Book the fair standards by which His awliya’ may be known, as He says (interpretation of the meaning): 

“No doubt! Verily, the Awliyaa’ of Allaah, no fear shall come upon them nor
shall they grieve.

Those who believed, and used to fear Allaah much (by abstaining from evil deeds
and sins and by doing righteous deeds)”

[Yoonus 10:62-63] 

Whoever is a believer and is pious is a close friend of Allaah, and whoever is not
like that is not a close friend of Allaah. If he has some faith and piety then he is a friend of Allaah to some extent.  

Nevertheless we cannot be certain about a specific person, but we say in general
that everyone who believes and is pious is a friend of Allaah (wali). 

Fataawa Muhimmah, p. 83, 84. 

And Allaah knows best.

 

al-Bukhaari and Muslim

 

Please give the history of Imam Bukhari and Imam Muslim.


Praise be to Allaah.
 

 

There follows a brief biography of these two
great imams. 

1 – Imam al-Bukhaari (may Allaah have
mercy on him) 

He is the great imam, scholar, leader of the
believers in hadeeth, Abu ‘Abd-Allaah Muhammad ibn Ismaa’eel ibn Ibraaheem al-Bukhaari. He was born in Bukhaara in Shawwaal of 194 AH, and grew up
as orphan. He lost his sight as a child, then Allaah restored to him his sight. He memorized hadeeth as a child, and he was a prodigy in that, may
Allaah have mercy on him. 

The imams attested to his good memory,
precision, knowledge, asceticism and worship. Imam Ahmad (may Allaah have mercy on him) said of him: Khorasan has never produced anyone like him. 

Ibn Khuzaymah (may Allaah have mercy on him)
said: I have never seen anyone beneath the canopy of heaven who has more knowledge of the hadeeth of the Messenger of Allaah (peace and
blessings of Allaah be upon him) and who has memorized more (hadeeth) than al-Bukhaari. 

Al-Tirmidhi (may Allaah have mercy on him)
said: I have never seen in Iraq or in Khorasan anyone with more knowledge of hadeeth criticism, history and isnaads than al-Bukhaari. 

Al-Bukhaari had more than one thousand
shaykhs whom he met in the countries and cities to which he travelled. Among them were: Imam Ahmad ibn Hanbal, Hammaad ibn Shaakir, Makki ibn
Ibraaheem and Abu ‘Aasim al-Nabeel. 

Among those who narrated from al-Bukhaari
were: 

Muslim ibn al-Hajjaaj the author of
al-Saheeh; al-Tirmidhi; al-Nasaa’i; Muhammad ibn Nasr al-Marwazi; and many others. 

Al-Bukhari wrote many books, the most famous
of which are: al-Jaami’ al-Saheeh; al-Tareekh al-Kabeer; al-Adab al-Mufrad; Khalq Af’aal al-‘Ibaad. 

He died, may Allaah have mercy on him, on the
night of Eid al-Fitr, 256 AH. 

2 – Imam Muslim (may Allaah have mercy on
him) 

He is the great imam, hafiz and scholar,
Abu’l-Husayn, Muslim ibn al-Hajjaaj ibn Muslim al-Nisaboori. He was born in 204 AH, or it was said in 206 AH. 

He devoted his time to hadeeth, and he
travelled in search of hadeeth and strove hard in that field, until he became very prominent. His contemporaries attested to his virtues. His
shaykh Muhammad ibn Bashshaar (Bandaar) said: The haafiz of this world are four: Abu Zar’ah in al-Ray, Muslim in Nisapur, ‘Abd-Allaah al-Daarimi
in Samarqand, and Muhammad ibn Ismaa’eel in Bukhaara. 

Ahmad ibn Salamah al-Nisaboori said: I saw
Abu Zar’ah and Abu Haatim giving precedence to Muslim ibn al-Hajjaaj in knowledge of saheeh over the shaykhs of their time.  

Ibn ‘Abd al-Barr said of him: They were
unanimously agreed on his eminence, leadership and high status. The greatest evidence of that is his book al-Saheeh; no book before it or
after is as well organized or precise in the isnaads of its hadeeth. 

His shaykhs included: Ahmad ibn Hanbal, al-Bukhaari, Yahya ibn Yahya al-Teemi, Ishaaq ibn
Raahawayh, Yahya ibn Ma’een, Abu Bakr ibn Abi Shaybah and many others. 

His students included: Abu Haatim al-Raazi,
Abu ‘Eesa al-Tirmidhi, Ibn Khuzaymah, Abu ‘Awaanah al-Isfaraayeeni and Makki ibn ‘Abdaan. 

His well known books include: al-Jaami’
al-Saheeh; al-Kuna wa’l-Asma’; al-Tabaqaat; al-Tamyeez; and al-Munfaridaat wa’l-Wahdaan. 

He died, may Allaah have mercy on him, in
Rajab 261 AH. 

For more information on the lives of these
two imams, see their biographies in Siyar A’laam al-Nubala’, 12/391-471; 557-580. 

See also question no.
21523.

If a person is wearing two layers of khufoof or socks, which one should he wipe over?

 

Is it permissible to wipe over two layers of socks worn one over another? If that is permissible and a person wipes over them, then takes off one layer and then breaks his wudoo’, is it permissible for him to wipe over the other or not?.

Praise be to Allaah.

It is permissible for a person to wear two layers of khufoof
or socks. If he wipes over one – in cases where it is permissible to do so,
as we shall see below – then he takes one off, and breaks his wudoo’, it is
permissible for him to wipe over the other, according to the opinion of some
of the scholars. 

Shaykh Ibn ‘Uthaymeen (may Allaah have mercy on him) a number
of scenarios in which a person wears two layers of khufoof or socks, as
follows: 

1 – If a person put on socks or khufoof then broke his
wudoo’, then put on another pair before doing wudoo’, the ruling applies to
the first layer, i.e., if he wants to wipe over them after that, he has to
wipe over the first layer, and it is not permissible for him to wipe over
the second layer. 

2 – If he puts on socks or khufoof, then he breaks his wudoo’
and wipes over them, then he puts on a second layer, then he may wipe over
the second layer according to the sound view. It says in al-Furoo’:
That is permissible according to Maalik. End quote. Al-Nawawi said: This is
the best view, because he put them on in a state of purity (tahaarah), and
their view that it is a lesser kind of purity is not acceptable. End quote. 

If we accept that, then the period of wiping starts from the
first time he wiped over the first layer. 

In this case he may also wipe over the first layer, without a
doubt. 

3 – If he puts khufoof on over khufoof or socks, and he wipes
the outer layer then takes it off, can he wipe over the lower layer for the
remainder of the period? I did not see any clear statement on this, but
al-Nawawi stated that Abu’l-‘Abbaas ibn Surayj said that if he puts
overshoes over the khufoof then one of three scenarios must apply: one of
which is that they become like a single khuff, with the upper layer visible
and the second layer like a lining, therefore he may wipe over the lower
layer until the period for wiping ends from the time he wiped over the upper
layer, which is like the case when the outer surface of the khuff becomes
worn or scratched – it is permissible to wipe over the lining.” End quote
from Fataawa al-Tahaarah, p. 192 

The “overshoe” (jurmooq) is something that is worn over the
regular khufoof, especially in cold countries. 

Kashshaaf al-Qinaa’, 1/130 

Al-Sharh al-Mumti’, 1/211 

And Allaah knows best.

The days of Tashreeq

 

What are the days of Tashreeq? What is special about them and distinguishes them from other days?.

Praise be to Allaah.
 

 

The days of Tashreeq are the 11th,
12th and 13th of Dhu’l-Hijjah. There are several verses and ahaadeeth which speak of their virtue: 

1 – Allaah says (interpretation of the
meaning): 

“And remember Allaah during the appointed
Days”

[al-Baqarah 2:203] 

These are the days of Tashreeq. This was the
view of Ibn ‘Umar and most of the scholars. 

2 – The Prophet (peace and blessings of
Allaah be upon him) said concerning the days of Tashreeq: “They are days of eating, drinking and remembering Allaah.” Dhikr (remembering Allaah)
is enjoined during the days of tashreeq in several ways: 

-        
Remembering Allaah immediately after the prescribed prayers by reciting Takbeer. This is prescribed
until the end of the days of Tashreeq according to the majority of scholars.

-        
Remembering Him by saying Bismillaah and Allaahu akbar when slaughtering the
sacrificial animal. The time for slaughtering the hadiy and udhiyah lasts until the end of days of Tashreeq.

-        
Remembering Allaah when eating and drinking. It is prescribed when eating and drinking to say
Bismillaah at the beginning, and to praise Him (say Al-hamdu Lillaah) at the end. According to the hadeeth narrated from the Prophet
(peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him): “Allaah likes His slave when he eats something to praise Him for it, and when he drinks
something to praise Him for it.” Narrated by Muslim, 2734.

-        
Remembering Him by saying Takbeer when stoning the Jamaraat on the days of Tashreeq. This applies
only to the pilgrims on Hajj.

-        
Remembering Allaah in general. It is mustahabb to make a lot of dhikr during the days of Tashreeq.
‘Umar used to recite Takbeer in Mina in his tent, and when the people heard him they recited Takbeer too and Mina echoed with the sound of their
Takbeer. Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning):

“So when you have
accomplished your Manaasik [rituals of Hajj], remember Allaah as you remember your forefathers or with a far more remembrance. But of mankind
there are some who say: “Our Lord! Give us (Your Bounties) in this world!” and for such there will be no portion in the Hereafter.

201. And of them
there are some who say: “Our Lord! Give us in this world that which is good and in the Hereafter that which is good, and save us from the torment
of the Fire!””

[al-Baqarah
2:200-201] 

Many of the salaf regarded it as mustahabb to
make a lot of du’aa’ during the days of tashreeq. 

The words of the Prophet (peace and
blessings of Allaah be upon him), “These are days of eating, drinking and remembering Allaah” indicate that eating and drinking during the days of
Eid are means that help one to remember Allaah and obey Him; perfect gratitude for the blessing means using it to help one obey and worship
Allaah, 

In His Book Allaah commands us to eat of good
things and thank Him for them. So whoever uses Allaah’s blessings to commit sin is showing ingratitude for the blessing of Allaah, so he deserves
to have it taken away from him. 

3 – The Prophet (peace and blessings of
Allaah be upon him) forbade fasting on these days: “Do not fast on these days, for they are the days of eating, drinking and remembering Allaah.”
Narrated by Ahmad, 10286; classed as saheeh by al-Albaani in al-Silsilah al-Saheehah, 3573.

 See Lataa’if al-Ma’aarif by Ibn
Rajab, p. 500.

 O Allaah, help us to do righteous deeds and
make us steadfast until death; have mercy on us, O Most Generous Giver. Praise be to Allaah, the Lord of the World.

 

The claims that ‘Ali fought against the Jinn are baseless lies

 

Is it true that Imaam ‘Ali (may Allaah be pleased with him) fought against the jinn? This is narrated in the book Ghazawaat al-Imaam ‘Ali, which says that he fought them until he sent them down to the seventh earth. What is your opinion of this book?

Praise be to Allaah. 

All of this is baseless. He did not fight the jinn and no such thing
happened at all. Rather this is false and is one of the lies and fabrications
that people have invented.  Abu’l-‘Abbaas Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyah
(may Allaah have mercy on him) stated this clearly and said: “It is
a lie which has no foundation. It is one of the false stories fabricated
by the liars.”  

Saying Karrama Allaah wajhahu for ‘Ali ibn Abi Taalib

 

I know that Amer almo'meneen Ali Bin abe Taleb rathey allah annah one of the great sahaba and the 4th khalefah to almo'meneeen and did not mada sojob to any image so we called him karram allah wajha .. but my Question is who is the person called Ali Bin Abe Taleb ( eb karram allah wajaha ) ??.


Praise be to Allaah.
 

 

It seems that the first ones who said “Karrama Allaah
wahjahu” (may Allaah honour his face) concerning ‘Ali ibn Abi Taalib
(may Allaah be pleased with him) were the Shi’ah, and some of the scribes
who took this from the Shi’ah.  

1 – Imam Ibn Katheer (may Allaah have mercy on him) said: 

I say: it is very common among many of the scribes who copy
out books to write ‘alayhi’l-salaam (peace be upon him) after the
name of ‘Ali (may Allaah be pleased with him) but not after the names of
other Sahaabah, or to write karrama Allaah wajhahu. Even though the
meaning is acceptable, all the Sahaabah should be treated with the same
respect. The two Shaykhs (i.e., Abu Bakr and ‘Umar) and ‘Uthmaan are more
deserving of that, may Allaah be pleased with them. 

Tafseer Ibn Katheer, 3/517-518 

2 – The Standing Committee said:

 Saying karrama Allaahu wajhahu after the name of ‘Ali
and singling him out for that is part of the exaggeration of the Shi’ah
concerning him. And it was said that this is because he never saw the ‘awrah
of another person, or because he never prostrated to any idol.  

But this does not apply only to him; it applies also to other
Sahaabah who were born in Islam. 

And Allaah knows best.

The book Taqreeb al-Tahdheeb

 

There is a book by Ibn Hajar al-‘Aqsallaani entitled Taqreeb al-Tahdheeb. What does this title mean, and what is the story of this book?


Praise be to Allaah.
 

 

This book is a highly condensed summary of a large book about
the names and status of narrators of hadeeth. 

Al-Haafiz al-Maqdisi (may Allaah have mercy on him) wrote his
book entitled al-Kamaal fi Asma’ al-Rijaal, in which he recorded the
sayings of the imams concerning the narrators of the two Saheehs and
the four Sunans, relying on the histories of al-Bukhaari, the book of
Ibn Abi Haatim, the book of Ibn Mu’een, his companions and so on. 

Then al-Haafiz al-Mazzi shortened the book
and called it Tahdheeb al-Kamaal. Then Ibn Hajar al-‘Asqallaani
shortened it further and added some material that was omitted by the two
earlier scholars, which was a great deal of material. He called this summary
Tahdheeb al-Tahdheeb. Then he condensed it further in the book called
Taqreeb al-Tahdheeb.

The contrast between the deeds of the Sahaabah and the deeds of the people at the end of time

 

I read a hadith in sahih al-jamii, where the Prophet said to the Sahaba that there would be Muslims that would come when the Religion is weak, and they would get reward equal to 50 times that of the Sahaba. I am confused, I thought that there was also a hadith where the Prophet said that the best generation is his, then the ones after them, and those after them. He also said that if someone gold that the sahaba gave?.

Praise be to Allaah.
 

 

In order to understand this issue we must
note that there are two types of reward, the reward for knowledge and the reward for accompanying the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah
be upon him). Some later members of the ummah may do deeds that are greater in reward than similar actions on the part of some of the Sahaabah
because they will have no one to support and help them, and because they will be subject to a great deal of temptation, but they will not have the
reward of having accompanied the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) and met him.

 Al-Haafiz Ibn Hajar said: 

The hadeeth “The righteous among them will
have the reward of fifty of you” does not mean that people other than the Sahaabah are superior to the Sahaabah, because simply having more reward
does not prove that one is superior. 

Moreover, the difference in reward is with
regard to the same type of deed. But the superiority attained by one who saw the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) cannot
be matched by anyone. 

This is how we may interpret the ahaadeeth
quoted above. 

Fath al-Baari, 7/7 

Shaykh al-Islam (Ibn Taymiyah – may Allaah
have mercy on him) said:  

They – meaning the later members of the ummah
– may have good deeds equivalent to those of fifty men among the Sahaabah, of the deeds that they did at that time. That is because the Sahaabah
had help and support in that, whereas those who come later may not have help and support. But the fact that the reward will be multiplied for them
in cases where it is not multiplied for the Sahaabah does not mean that they are better than the Sahaabah or that their virtue is any greater than
that of the Sahaabah. What the Sahaabah achieved in terms of faith, jihad and fighting the people of this earth by supporting the Messenger,
believing what he said and obeying his teachings before his call spread, his word prevailed, the number of his supporters increased and the proof
of his Prophethood became widely known, indeed when the believers were so few in number and the disbelievers and hypocrites were so many, and the
believers spent their wealth for the sake of Allaah, seeking His pleasure in that situation, is something that no one can achieve the like of any
more. As it says in al-Saheehayn, the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: “Do not curse the Sahaabah, for by the
One in Whose hand is my soul, if any one of you spent the equivalent of Mount Uhud in gold, he would not attain the level of any one of them, or
even come half way.” 

Majmoo’ al-Fataawa,
13/65, 66 

Moreover, there is no virtuous deed that
those who come later can do, but those who came before did something similar in a more perfect fashion. 

With regard to the words “They will have the
reward of fifty of you because you have supporters who help you to do good and they will not have any supporters who will help them to do good,”
this is correct in a case where a deed done by a single person among those who come later are like the deed done by a group of people among those
who came before, so he will have the reward of fifty. But you should not imagine that one of those who come later will do deeds like those of some
of the major Sahaabah such as Abu Bakr and ‘Umar, for there will never again be a Prophet like Muhammad (peace and blessings of Allaah be
upon him) with whom people may do deeds like those that were done with Muhammad (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him). 

With regard to the words, “My ummah is like
the rain, I do not know whether the first of it is better or the last of it,” although this hadeeth is not very sound, what it means is that among
those who come later there will be those who are similar to those who came before, and they will be so close that the one who tries to compare
them will not know which is better, even though one of them is in fact better. 

This is glad tidings for those who come
later, that among them will be those who are close to those who came before them, as it says in another hadeeth: “The best of my ummah are the
first and the last, and between them there will be some crookedness. Would that I could see my brethren.” They said, “Are we not your brethren?”
He said, “You are my companions.” This shows that precedence was given to the Sahaabah, because they alone are his companions, which is a higher
status than merely being brothers.” 

Majmoo’ al-Fataawa, 11/370, 371 

It is worth pointing out that there is no
basis for the phrase used in the question, “the best of generations is my generation”, although it is often used in the books of Ahl al-Sunnah.
Moreover, there is a mistake with regard to its meaning. If this is what he said, then he would have said after it, “then the one that follows
it.” But the wording of the hadeeth is “then those who follow them.” The wording of the saheeh hadeeth is: “The best of mankind is my generation”
and “The best of my ummah is my generation.” 

And Allaah knows best.

Haatim al-Taa’i in the Sunnah

 

What did Prophet Muhammad say regarding Hatim Tai?.

Praise be to Allaah.
 

 

There are a number of ahaadeeth which mention
Haatim al-Taai, some of which are hasan (good), some da’eef (weak) and some mawdoo’ (fabricated). 

(a)  
It was narrated that ‘Adiyy ibn Haatim said: I said to the Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him),
“My father used to uphold the ties of kinship, and do such and such… Will he have any (reward) for that?” He said, “Your father seeking something
and he got it.”  

This was narrated by Ahmad, 32/129, and
classed and hasan by Shaykh Shu’ayb al-Arna’oot. 

(b) 
It was narrated that ‘Adiyy ibn Haatim said: I said, “O Messenger of Allaah, my father used to uphold the ties of kinship, and do
such and such.” He said, “Your father wanted something and got it” meaning, fame. 

Narrated by Ahmad (30/200); classed as hasan
by Shaykh Shu’ayb al-Arna’oot, and classed as saheeh by Ibn Hibbaan, 1/41. 

(c)  
It was narrated from Sahl ibn Sa’d al-Saa’idi that ‘Adiyy ibn Haatim came to the Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of
Allaah be upon him) and said: “O Messenger of Allaah, my father used to uphold the ties of kinship, and spend on the needy, and feed people.” He
said, “Did he live to see Islam?” He said, “No.” He said, “Your father wanted to be remembered.”  

Narrated by al-Tabaraani in al-Kabeer,
6/197. Its isnaad includes Rushdeen ibn Sa’d, who is da’eef (weak), but it is supported by the report mentioned above. 

The phrase translated above and “spend on the
needy” means spending on the weak, the poor, orphans and dependents, etc. 

(d) 
It was narrated that Ibn ‘Umar said: Mention was made of Haatim in the presence of the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah
be upon him), and he said, “That is a man who wanted something and got it.” 

Al-Haythami said: 

This was narrated by al-Bazzaar, and its isnaad includes ‘Ubayd ibn Waaqid al-‘Absi, who was
classed as da’eef by Abu Haatim. 

Majma’ al-Zawaa’id,
1/119 

But it is supported by the reports quoted
above. 

Ibn Katheer said: 

We have mentioned the biography of Haatim
Tay’ in the days of the Jaahiliyyah when we mentioned those who died of the famous people of that era, and we referred to his generosity and
kindness to people. But generosity and kindness must be based on faith if they are to benefit a person in the Hereafter, but he never said one
day, “O Lord, forgive me my sins on the Day of Judgement.” 

Al-Bidaayah wa’l-Nihaayah,
5/67. 

And Allaah knows best.