Friday, 20 January 2012

Billionaire to donate $7.5 million to repair cracks in Washington Monument

WASHINGTON — A deep-pocketed philanthropist will kick in half of the $15 million needed to repair the Washington Monument shuttered by August’s East Coast earthquake.

Repairs are expected to keep the 555-foot obelisk closed to visitors at least through August 2013, and billionaire history buff David Rubenstein wanted get the show on the road.

"This Washington Monument is probably one of the most recognizable buildings in the United States next to the Capitol and the Empire State Building," he said. "It could use a little repair work, and I wanted people to get to see it as soon as possible."

A lawyer and veteran of the Carter Administration, in 1987 Rubenstein founded The Carlyle Group, a powerful Washington-based private equity firm.

Last summer’s rare shake left cracks in the monument’s walls as long as four feet and an inch wide, some even letting in daylight.

Congress appropriated $7.5 million for the repairs on the condition that a private donor or donors match the sum.

The monument, completed in 1884, was actually built with private $1 donations totaling over $1 million, Rubenstein told The Associated Press.

The National Park Service, which oversees the monument, said repairs are expected to begin in August and would take a year.

The structure will still need more work, to include a seizmic study, reinforcement, and repair of water damage, AP reported.

During the quake, panicked visitors fled down flights of stairs to eascape, but there were no known deaths or serious injuries in the region

.

Late last year, engineers wearing helmets and climbing harnesses rappelled slowly down the monument, conducting visual inspection of the cracks left by the quake.

Construction began in 1848, but funds ran out during the Civil War when the monument was left as an embarrassing stump for years.

The monument was the world’s tallest man-made structure when until it was surpassed by the Eiffel Tower. It remains the tallest structure in Washington, D.C.

Rubenstein has made large gifts in recent years to Washington's Smithsonian Institution, the National Archives, the Library of Congress and the Kennedy Center.

A history buff, Rubenstein owns a copy of the Magna Carta, among other historical documents, and reveres George Washington.

"I like to remind people about American history," he said. "George Washington is an incredible figure. When he was the head of the Revolutionary War Army, he could have stayed on as really the head of the government when we won the Revolutionary War, but he put down his arms."

With News Wire Services

Hospice worker who faked cancer swindled $30,000 from caring friends

\

ennifer Risa Stover, 35, of Wheat Ridge, Colo., who allegedly pretended to have cancer and bilked her coworkers and their friends out of more than $30,000.

A Colorado hospice care worker was able to raise an amazing $30,000 in the name of fighting cancer - but her motives were anything but benign, according to a report.

The 35-year-old medical worker from Colorado was indicted Tuesday by a grand jury for swindling friends and coworkers by pretending she had cancer - a lie that she'd been stretching since 2008, according to a broadcast by Colorado’s 9News.

Jennifer Risa Stover, who worked at the Collier Hospice in Wheat Ridge, reportedly told a co-worker she had a cyst in her uterus and was undergoing "experimental treatment," as part of her ruse to miss work and collect money from concerned friends.

"Our hearts went out to her. She went to a doctor and was having some issues. She didn't want to talk about it much. The next thing I know is that she has cancer," coworker Rosemary Swingle told the news station.

One magnanimous colleague gave Stover $12,000 from her own life savings, according to the report.

"She has a heart of gold. She didn't even question it. Didn't even question it. Believed her," the news show quoted Swingle describing the hoodwinked Samaritan.

Stover allegedly managed to dupe 16 people to donate a total of $30,000 to help cover medical costs and a burdensome mortgage.

The Jefferson County district attorney, Scott Storey, said investigators don't know where the money went.

Court records show Stover told her bosses she needed time off to undergo treatment for uterine cancer but quit when she could not produce legitimate documentation to justify her absences.

"Jennifer Stover was an employee here and she voluntarily resigned in June of 2010 when we requested verification for her request of medical leave of absence. She did not provide it and she instead resigned," Wendy Forbes, director of communications for Collier Hospice told 9News.

Court records show Stover was trying to pay off loans and had gone through a divorce, but had no criminal record prior to this arrest.

Stover, who now works as a temp at the Hospice of St. John according to 9News, was charged with theft and charitable fraud and posted $5,000 bond on Tuesday.

Penn State trustees say Paterno didn’t do enough after Sandusky scandal: report

NEW YORK -- Penn State's trustees agonized over the future of legendary football coach Joe Paterno but ultimately decided to fire the Hall of Famer in part over what they said was his failure to go to authorities with a report of alleged sexual assault of a child by an assistant coach nearly a decade ago, according to a report published Thursday in The New York Times.

Some of the 13 trustees interviewed by the Times said they were also troubled by Paterno greeting fans and supporters on his front lawn — and leading them in school cheers — just after the release of a scathing grand jury report detailing child sex abuse allegations against retired assistant coach Jerry Sandusky.

The trustees said they were also concerned about Paterno's ability to lead the team during the scandal that also resulted in the ouster of university President Graham Spanier, but most jarring was the feeling the coach had failed to do enough after learning of a 2002 incident involving Sandusky and a boy in an on-campus shower.

"Every adult has a responsibility for every other child in our community. ...We have a responsibility for ensuring that we can take every effort that's within our power not only to prevent further harm to that child, but to every other child," said trustee Kenneth Frazier.

The alleged 2002 shower assault ultimately resulted in charges against two university officials, athletic director Tim Curley and vice president Gary Schultz. They're charged with failing to report suspected child abuse and perjury related to their testimony before the grand jury.

Paterno's attorney defended the coach's actions in a statement, saying Paterno passed on a report about an alleged assault to his superiors at the university believing they would investigate and act appropriately.

Newt Gingrich is picking up steam in South Carolina against Mitt Romney: polls

ROCHESTER, MI - NOVEMBER 09: (L-R) Former speaker of the house Newt Gingrich, former massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney and former ceo of godfather's pizza Herman Cain look on prior to a debate hosted by CNBC and the Michigan Republican Party at Oakland University on November 9, 2011 in Rochester, Michigan. The debate is the first meeting of the eight GOP presidential hopefuls since allegations of sexual impropriety have surfaced against front-runner Herman Cain. (Photo by Scott Olson/Getty Images)

Watch out: here comes Newt Gingrich.

The Republican presidential candidate is gaining ground on Mitt Romney in South Carolina, just days before the critical, first-in-the-South primary, according to several new polls.

A Politico survey released Thursday shows the ex-Massachusetts governor with 37% support among likely GOP voters. Gingrich is on Romney's heels, trailing behind at 30%.

Libertarian-minded Congressman Ron Paul (R-Tex.) trails behind with 11%, followed by former Pennsylvania Sen. Rick Santorum's 10% and Rick Perry's meager 4%.

Those results echoed a new NBC News/Marist poll, showing Gingrich trailing behind Romney by 10 points.

In that survey, which was taken on Monday and Tuesday, the numbers were strikingly different before and after Monday's debate, in which Romney was ripped by his rivals for not releasing his tax records (he later hedged and said he would make the documents public in April).

Before the debate, Romney was ahead of Gingrich in the poll by 15 points, but on Tuesday the advantage slimmed down to just five points.

Gingrich got another boost on Thursday after news broke that Texas Gov. Rick Perry was dropping out of the presidential race and endorsing him.


Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/newt-gingrich-picking-steam-south-carolina-mitt-romney-polls-article-1.1008585#ixzz1k08Ko23W

Rick Perry quits Republican presidential race, backs Newt Gingrich

Texas Gov. Rick Perry quit his GOP bid for the White House Thursday.

Take our Poll

Eye On Newt

Does Newt Gingrich have a real shot at winning the GOP nomination?

Yes, with the backing of Rick Perry and possibly Sarah Palin, he has the conservative voted locked.
No, Mitt Romney has too much money and way less personal baggage, Newt's a pretender.
I'm a Democrat who thinks Obama would beat Gingrich, but not Romney, so go Newt!

Texas Gov. Rick Perry quit the Republican race for the White House Thursday and threw his support to Newt Gingrich.

The move could give the ex-speaker, who is surging in the polls, a chance to defeat front-runner Mitt Romney in South Carolina’s primary on Saturday.

“I have no question that Newt Gingrich has the heart of a conservative reformer,” Perry said in his farewell speech in Charleston, S.C.

PHOTOS: CELBRITY PRESIDENTIAL ENDORSEMENTS

Perry gave his blessing despite questions — including a claim by Gingrich’s ex-wife that her spouse wanted an open marriage — swirling around the controversial Georgian.

“Newt is not perfect, but who among us is?” said Perry. “I believe in the power of redemption.”

The news capped off a brutal morning for Romney, who is battling controversies about his tax returns and offshore financial holdings — and who just found out that he actually lost the Iowa caucus.

The former Massachusetts governor, who is more moderate than most of his rivals, has benefited from the divided conservative field.

But as the right-wing field narrows, those conservative supporters could coalesce around one candidate, creating a formidable rival.

Perry, whose mistake-filled campaign never hit its stride, was polling in the single digits in South Carolina, so it’s not immediately clear how much of a benefit his endorsement will provide Gingrich.

But it could build momentum for the speaker, who may also siphon off supporters of former Pennsylvania senator Rick Santorum or win over some undecided voters.

When Perry entered the race in August, the Texas governor was immediately viewed as a GOP favorite because of his economic record in the Lone Star State and his strong fund-raising skills.

But his campaign stumbled out of the gate and was doomed by a series of poor debate performances, most infamously when he could not remember the name of the third Cabinet agency he wanted to close — and simply blurted out “Ooops.”

TIMELINE: A LOOK AT RICK PERRY'S QUICK RISE AND EVEN QUICKER FALL

“I know when it’s time to make a strategic retreat,” said Perry, whose defeats in the 2012 nomination fight were the first electoral losses of his career. “I believe the mission is greater than the man.”

In the last days of his campaign, Perry trained his fire on Romney, first attacking the front-runner’s time in the private sector and then hitting him on social issues so crucial in the conservative Palmetto State.

Romney rolled into South Carolina knowing that a win there could effectively lock up the nomination.

But his poll numbers have slipped as questions have been raised about the tax rate he pays and the millions of dollars he has invested in Caribbean bank accounts.

And early Thursday, the Iowa GOP party certified its official caucus results — and overturned Romney’s eight-vote margin.

Though the party refused to declare an official winner, it released results showing that Santorum had garnered more votes than Romney.

Bill Clinton predicts Obama will win bid for second term, lauds his economic policies

Former President Bill Clinton on the cover of Esquire.

Take our Poll

Bam 2.0

Do you think Presidnet Obama will win re-election in 2012?

Yes. No one can beat him.
No. A Republican will win.
Who knows?
President Barack Obama will be in New York on Thursday.

Haraz N. Ghanbari/AP

President Barack Obama will be in New York on Thursday.

Bubba is banking on President Obama getting reelected in November.

“I think Barack Obama will be the next President,” Bill Clinton says without hesitation in a new Esquire interview. “I think he will win.”

Americans may be impatient with the pace of the recovery from the Great Recession, but “they will conclude that it takes a long time to get out of the kind of economic distress were were in,” Clinton said.

The public understands Obama inherited an economic meltdown from George W. Bush and that the Republicans are offering more of the same failed policies, Clinton said.

Voters also understand that Obama’s “policies are more likely to move us out of that than if they give the White House and the Congress to a party that will give them more of what they just had,” Clinton said.

Also, Obama can point to his rescue of the U.S. auto industry and “he’s going to have a very strong national-security record to run on,” said Clinton. “So he won’t be vulnerable there.”

In the interview, Clinton also said the Republican Party that Obama has had to contend is different from the one he he grappled with during his two terms.

“We’re living in a time when the Republicans have only pushed harder and harder to the right,” he said.

Clinton said this has even affected his one-time nemesis, former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, who is now running for President and closing in on GOP front-runner Mitt Romney.

“As a private citizen, he was for certain important health-care reforms and believed in climate change,” Clinton said of the Georgia Republican. “And now he’s just like Romney. Neither one of them can say what they believe to be true and get nominated.”

“Romney’s still trying to figure out what he did as governor of Massachusetts and still appeal” to the hard right in the GOP, Clinton said.

Surprisingly, given how the GOP pushed hard for his impeachment, Clinton said, “I liked working with Republicans.”

Clinton also praised current House Speaker John Boehner, an Ohio Republican, as a man with “good sense.”

The former President’s rosy reelection prediction was music to the ears of Obama, who was back in the Big Apple on Thursday for a trio of star-studded campaign fund-raisers.

The commander in chief’s first stop is the lavish Upper East Side restaurant Daniel, where he will break bread with Jewish leader paying $15,000 per plate for the privilege.

Next, Obama will attend dinner at director Spike Lee's brownstone on 63rd St. It’s a small gathering of just about 40 people, but tickets start at a whopping $38,500 per person.

Obama winds up his day with a stop at the historic Apollo theater in Harlem, where singers Al Green and India.Arie will perform. Tickets for that event start at $100 per person and soar to $25,000.

The President could encounter some protesters as he heads uptown.

Obama’s pricey fund-raisers represent "a profound disconnect the sitting President has with poor and working class blacks that constitute his core base of support," said Nellie Bailey of Occupy Harlem.

Obama and the Democratic National Committee raised more than $220 million last year in preparation for the 2012 election.


Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/president-obama-york-city-hold-trio-fundraisers-2012-re-election-bid-article-1.1008607#ixzz1k07XOg00

U.S. Navy rescues Iranians in distress at sea ... again

A rigid hull boat with sailors from U.S. guided-missile destroyer Dewey speak with mariners on an Iranian fishing dhow.

Sailors from guided-missile destroyer USS Dewey's (DDG 105) visit, board, search and seizure (VBSS) team provided food, water and medical supplies to distressed Iranian mariners, January 18, 2012 in the Arabian Sea.

AFP/Getty Images

Sailors from guided-missile destroyer Dewey provided food, water and medical supplies to distressed Iranian mariners,

The U.S. Navy sailed to the rescue yet again.

An American guided missile-destroyer, the Dewey, rescued a sinking Iranian fishing boat Wednesday morning after it were spotted by a Navy helicopter, according to NBC News.

Once the Iranian crew was on board, they were given food, water, and medical and hygienic supplies, according to the report.

The incident caps off a series of U.S. rescues of Iranians at sea, and comes at a time when tension between Washington and Tehran is escalating over Iran’s nuclear ambitions.

Last week, the U.S. military rescued distressed Iranian soldiers from an Iranian cargo ship whose engine room was flooding. And earlier this month, the Navy rescued a dozen Iranians who had been held hostage by pirates for weeks.

While Iranian officials called that rescued a "goodwill gesture" abroad, the country's semi-official news agency painted it as a Hollywood-fabricated drama.

Iranian officials have not commented on the latest save.

‘Unemployed graduates’ in Morocco set themselves on fire to protest lack of jobs

RABAT, Morocco -- Five unemployed Moroccan men set themselves on fire in the capital Rabat as part of widespread demonstrations in the country over the lack of jobs, especially for university graduates, a rights activist said Thursday. Three were burned badly enough to be hospitalized.

Once rare, self-immolation became a tactic of protest in the Middle East and North Africa ever since a vegetable seller in Tunisia set himself on fire in December 2010 to protest police harassment, setting off an uprising that toppled the government and sparked similar movements elsewhere in the region.

The Moroccans were part of the "unemployed graduates" movement, a loose collections of associations across the country filled with millions of university graduates demanding jobs. The demonstrations are often violently dispersed by police and in some towns and cities have resulted in sustained clashes.

While the official unemployment rate is only 9.1 percent nationally, it rises to around 16 percent for graduates.

Around 160 members of the movement have been occupying an administrative building of the Ministry of Higher Education for the past two weeks in Rabat as part of their protest. Supporters would bring them food until two days ago when security forces stopped them.

"The authorities prevented them from receiving food and water, so five people went outside to get food and threatened to set themselves on fire if they were stopped," said Youssef al-Rissouni of the Moroccan Association for Human Rights.

Of the three who were hospitalized, two were in serious condition, while the other two just had their clothing singed, he added.

Online videos of the incident show at least one person writhing while covered in flames. Photos afterwards showed men with large sections of their skin burned. The online newspaper Goud reported that two of the men had second degree burns and were going to be sent to the Casablanca burn unit.

While the Moroccan economy has posted steady growth rates for the last several years of around 4 to 5 percent, it has been unable create enough jobs for the growing numbers of young people entering the work force every year.

The self-immolation of Tunisia's Mohammed Bouazizi in the hardscrabble town of Sidi Bouzid in December 2010 became the symbol of the depths of despair to which the poor of North Africa and the Middle East have sunk. Last week, four more people set themselves on fire in Tunisia, including a father of three who died from his burns.

Teen shot on Queens bus but won’t cooperate with cops

A 16-year-old boy was shot in the groin on a city bus in Queens Thursday, sources said.

The teen was riding in a southbound Q113 bus near Mott and Central avenues in Far Rockaway when a gunman fired at him about 3:10 p.m., the sources said.

The teen was taken to Long Island Jewish Hospital, where he is expected to survive.

Sources said the teen was not cooperating with investigators and there were no immediate reports of any arrests.

On Dec. 2, an ex-con killed one straphanger and injured another man after he opened fire on a Q111 bus in Jamaica. Damel Burton, 34, allegedly shot the two men on the bus after he killed his girlfriend’s 18-year-old son, Keith Murrell.

He is currently being held without bail on murder charges.

jkemp@nydailynews.com

Five myths about the Keystone XL pipeline

After months of intense debates and protests, the Obama administration has finally decided the fate of the Keystone XL pipeline project: It’s not going to happen anytime soon.

The proposed pipeline would have moved about 700,000 barrels of oil-like bitumen from the Alberta oil sands to Texas refineries each day, and oil companies and their allies lobbied hard for it — including with an ad blitz that ran during Republican presidential debates. But, in a victory for environmental activists and parts of the president’s base, the State Department has rejected the permit for its construction (though it has left the door open for its backers to reapply).

Is the decision a boon for the environment or a slap at an already weak economy? Let’s separate fact from fiction.

1. The pipeline would have been catastrophic for global climate change.

For opponents of the Keystone XL pipeline, the issue was one of simple math: The project would have facilitated increased production of Canadian oil sands, and a gallon of gasoline derived from oil sands produces 5 to 15 percent greater greenhouse gas emissions than a gallon of gasoline made from a typical barrel of conventional oil. Also, they noted, Canada’s oil sands are the second-largest petroleum deposit in the world, and if burned completely, it would have been “game over” for the planet’s fight against climate change, in the words of NASA scientist James Hansen, a leading climate specialist.

That is all technically true — but it misses the point. The additional emissions generated by replacing conventional oil with the crude that the pipeline could have carried would have been no more than a small fraction of 1 percent of total annual U.S. greenhouse gas pollution. Meanwhile, it would take more than 1,000 years to burn all the oil sands, even if extraction were ramped up threefold from its current pace. The fate of the climate will be determined long before that.

2. The pipeline would have reduced U.S. reliance on oil from the Middle East.

Worries about dependence on Middle Eastern oil have long animated U.S. energy policy — and the Keystone XL pipeline would have transported almost as much oil each year as the United States currently imports annually from Saudi Arabia.

But U.S. vulnerability to turmoil in the Middle East is linked to how much oil we consume, not where we buy it from. The price of oil is set on world markets: When convulsions in Libya sent the price of crude up 30 percent last year, prices for Canadian heavy oil (similar to what is produced from oil sands) rose by nearly 55 percent.

Some pipeline proponents also pointed out that Canadian oil currently sells at a discount compared with oil supplies from the rest of the world. Keystone XL, however, wouldn’t have led Canada to start offering greater amounts of crude at reduced prices — instead, Canadian producers would have gained more leverage and would have been able to sell their oil at the world price.

3. The pipeline would have created hundreds of thousands of American jobs.

During the debate over the Keystone project, the oil industry rolled out a series of studies claiming that pipeline construction would create 20,000 temporary jobs in the United States and that lower oil prices (they didn’t say exactly how much lower) resulting from the new crude supplies would create as many as 250,000 more jobs across the country over the long term. These numbers were cited repeatedly by politicians who supported the pipeline.

However, the first number refers to “person-years” of employment — a single job that lasts two years is counted twice; and in any case, it pales compared with the overall U.S. employment challenge. The second number is more impressive but relies on an overly optimistic estimate of how much the pipeline would have reduced global oil prices. The administration’s rejection of the pipeline will probably add less than a dollar a barrel to the long-term price of oil, hardly a decisive factor when prices are already around $100 per barrel.

SOPA protests by Google and Facebook upend traditional lobbying

Jan. 19 (Bloomberg) -- An online protest led by Google Inc. and Facebook Inc. against U.S. anti-piracy bills illustrates how Internet companies are changing legislative debate in Washington.

Nine co-sponsors, five in the Senate and four House members, began withdrawing their support for Hollywood-backed measures to combat piracy. Internet companies devoted home pages yesterday to opposing the bills, threatening a traditional lobbying effort led by the Motion Picture Association of America that assembled bipartisan support for the legislation.

The movie and music industries want Google and online services to block non-U.S. websites that peddle pirated movies and counterfeit goods, while Internet companies say the bills would promote censorship, disrupt the Web’s architecture and harm their ability to innovate.

“It’s unprecedented,” Jonathan Zittrain, a Harvard University professor of law and computer science who serves on the boards of bill opponents Electronic Frontier Foundation and Internet Society, said in an interview. “You could see some members of Congress saying there’s no percentage in it for me to stick out my neck on something like this.”

The anti-piracy bills call for the U.S. Justice Department to seek court orders forcing Internet-service providers, search engines, payment processors and online ad networks to block or stop doing business with non-U.S. sites linked to piracy. The measures would let private copyright holders seek court orders forcing payment and ad companies to cut off such websites.

Changing Political Process

A promise by lead sponsors of the bills to drop the requirement for service providers to block websites, after opponents said it may harm the Web’s domain-name system, failed to stop Internet companies from protesting.

“These organizations have reinvented a lot of the ways we live, how we connect, how we absorb media,” said Rogan Kersh, an associate dean at New York University’s Wagner School who conducts research on lobbying. “They’re now trying to reinvent how we carry out democratic politics.”

Visitors to Google, the world’s most popular search engine, were greeted yesterday by a black box covering the company’s familiar icon, and a message that read “Tell Congress: Please don’t censor the Web!” The message linked to a page outlining Mountain View, California-based Google’s opposition and an option to join an online petition urging Congress to reject the legislation.

Wikipedia, the online encyclopedia run by a nonprofit organization where users contribute entries, shut the English language version of its website for 24 hours to protest the bills, displaying a blacked-out page that gave people contact information for their elected officials.

Congressional Sites Slowed

“We can’t let poorly thought out laws get in the way of the Internet’s development,” Facebook Chief Executive Officer Mark Zuckerberg said in a post on the social network yesterday. The message connects to a Facebook page outlining the company’s opposition to the bills, with a link for people to contact members of Congress.

Center for American Progress, group tied to Obama, under fire from Israel advocates

 

Center for American Progress, group tied to Obama, under fire from Israel advocates

  • Smaller Text Larger Text Text Size
  • Print
  • Reprints

The Center for American Progress, a liberal think tank closely aligned with the White House, is embroiled in a dispute with several major Jewish organizations over statements on Israel and charges that some center staffers have used anti-Semitic language to attack pro-Israel Americans.

The controversy reflects growing divisions among important allies of President Obama over Middle East policy that could complicate the president’s reelection outreach to some Jewish voters, just as he is seeking to assure them of his commitment to Israel’s security amid fears of an Iran nuclear threat.

Among the points of contention are several Twitter posts by one CAP writer on his personal account referring to “Israel-firsters.” Some experts say the phrase has its roots in the anti-Semitic charge that American Jews are more loyal to a foreign country. In another case, a second staffer described a U.S. senator as showing more fealty to the prime U.S. pro-Israel lobby, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, than to his own constituents, replacing a standard identifier of party affiliation and state with “R-AIPAC” on his personal Twitter account. The first writer has since left the staff.

Critics are also pointing to writings on the CAP Web site, where staffers have suggested the pro-Israel lobby is pushing the U.S. toward war with Iran and likened Israel’s treatment of Palestinians in Gaza to the policies of the segregated American South.

Those statements, among others, have gained notice largely because of CAP’s influential role in Obama’s Washington. Founded and chaired by John Podesta, a onetime chief of staff in the Clinton White House, the center is an idea generator for the administration and a source for many of its top officials. The executive who headed the arm overseeing the CAP bloggers, Jennifer Palmieri, recently became a top communications official in the White House, and Podesta is now a part-time adviser to the State Department.

Several major Jewish groups have demanded corrective action by the think tank and asked for answers from friends in the White House.

“The language is corrosive and unacceptable,” said Rabbi Abraham Cooper, associate director of the Simon Wiesenthal Center. He added that the blog posts and tweets from CAP staffers “are the responsibility of the adults who run the place, not only the kids who play.”

Cooper conveyed his concerns about CAP during a private White House meeting last week with Obama’s newly hired Jewish community liaison.

The White House official, Jarrod Bernstein, told Cooper that the situation at CAP was “troubling,” adding “that is not this administration.”

A White House spokesman, Matt Lehrich, declined to comment on CAP. He said Obama “has repeatedly reiterated America’s unshakable commitment to Israel’s security and stood up against attempts to single out Israel in international forums.” He added that the administration has “ratcheted up unprecedented pressure on Iran.”

Abraham Foxman, national director of the Anti-Defamation League, said some of the statements from CAP staffers “are anti-Semitic and borderline anti-Semitic.”

Britain admits 'fake rock' plot to spy on Russians

Tony Blair's former aide Jonathan Powell says UK was behind plot to spy on Russians with device hidden in fake plastic rock

Britain was behind a plot to spy on Russians with a device hidden in a fake plastic rock, a former key UK government official has admitted.

Jonathan Powell, former chief of staff to prime minister Tony Blair, admitted in a BBC documentary that allegations made by the Russians in 2006 - dismissed at the time - were in fact true.

"The spy rock was embarrassing," he said in the BBC2 documentary series, Putin, Russia and the West. "They had us bang to rights. Clearly they had known about it for some time and had been saving it up for a political purpose."

A diplomatic row was sparked six years ago after Russian state television broadcast a film claiming British agents had hidden a sophisticated transmitter inside a fake rock left on a Moscow street. It accused embassy officials of allegedly downloading classified data from the transmitter using palm-top computers.

The TV report showed a video of a man slowing his pace and glancing down at the rock before walking quickly away; another man was shown kicking the rock, while another walked by and picked it up. The Russian security service, the FSB, broadcast X-rays of a hollowed-out rock filled with circuitry and accused four British men and one Russian of using it to download information.

The FSB alleged that British security services were making secret payments to pro-democracy and human rights groups. Soon after the incident, then President Vladimir Putin forced the closure of many non-governmental organisations (NGOs) after introducing a law restricting them from receiving funding from foreign governments.

"We have seen attempts by the secret services to make use of NGOs. NGOs have been financed through secret service channels. No one can deny that this money stinks," said Putin. "This law has been adopted to stop foreign powers interfering in the internal affairs of the Russian Federation."

Britain's ambassador in Moscow at the time, Tony Brenton, denied the government had been involved in covert activities.

"All of our activities with the NGOs were completely above board," he said. "They were on our website, the sums of money, the projects. All of that was completely public."

The revelation comes at a sensitive time, with Putin renewing attacks on human rights and opposition activists as hostility to his premiership grows. He has repeatedly accused the west, namely the US, of using activists to plot to bring regime change to Russia.

"Putin, as a former spy and KGB agent, is trying to discredit us with the only methods he knows," said Lev Ponomaryov, a prominent human rights activist. "For any thinking person this rock meant nothing – it was simply a provocation, a cheap trick used by a former KGB agent."At the time Blair attempted to play down the allegations, and the Foreign Office denied any irregular relations with Russian NGOs. When asked about the incident, Blair smiled as he told journalists: "I think the less said about that, the better."

Costa Concordia: captain drank alcohol with 'beautiful' woman prior to crash

Domnica Cermontan, 25, from Moldova said she believed the captain had saved the lives of passengers by grounding the vessel Photograph: Enterprise News and Picture

The cruise ship captain who steered his 114,000-tonne vessel into rocks off the Italian coast last Friday was drinking wine at dinner with a "beautiful" woman minutes earlier, a witness has claimed.

Francesco Schettino, who is under house arrest accused of manslaughter and abandoning ship after he grounded the Costa Concordia on the island of Giglio following the collision, has told investigators that he had not drunk alcohol that night. But a passenger, Angelo Fabbri, has revealed that he and his wife watched Schettino enjoy a gourmet meal with red wine at the ship's most exclusive restaurant.

"Schettino, in a dark uniform, was sat in front of a young woman," Fabbri told newspaper Il Secolo XIX. "She appeared young, initially we thought she could even be his daughter. A beautiful woman, slim, shoulder-length blonde hair, a black dress with bare arms. They were laughing, they were informal, it was very merry," he said.

"The wine?" he added. "There is no doubt they drank, at least a whole decanter, the last drops were poured into the commander's glass."

Fabbri, who described Schettino as a "show-off", said the captain, the woman and another officer left the restaurant around 9.05pm. At around 9.45pm Schettino was back on the bridge, where he steered the ship into rocks while attempting to "salute" a former captain who was a native of Giglio.

Italian media reported on Thursday that investigators are trying to interview Domnica Cermontan, 25, a Moldovan employee of Costa Crociere, the cruise ship's owner. A spokesman for Costa Crociere said the company was "ready to provide authorities" with information about "the woman who on the evening of the incident appears to have dined with Captain Schettino".

In an interview with Romanian newspaper Adevarul, Cermontan said she left the bridge at 11.50pm, at which time Schettino was still there.

Cermontan also told a Romanian TV station she believed Schettino saved the lives of passengers by grounding the vessel. "He has done something extraordinary," she said. Prosecutors believe that Schettino delayed telling the coast guard the ship was holed and then left the vessel while 300 passengers were still on board.

The bodies of 11 passengers and crew have been found by rescuers and 21 passengers remain unaccounted for.

According to audio tapes released on Thursday a crew member on board the ship told coast guard officials 30 minutes after the collision that the Costa Concordia had suffered a mere black out and that there was no emergency on board.

Costa Concordia captain tells judge how he left stricken cruise ship

Francesco Schettino describes mayhem onboard after vessel ran aground off Italian coast but prosecutor disputes account

Police divers close to the wrecked Costa Concordia cruise ship off the coast of Giglio island, Italy. Photograph: Massimo Percossi/EPA

The cruise-liner captain accused of abandoning ship after it struck rocks off the Tuscan coast last Friday has reportedly claimed he could not lead the evacuation because he slipped and fell into a lifeboat while helping passengers leave the stricken vessel.

Captain Francesco Schettino said it was an accident that he left the Costa Concordia, according to Italian press reports. "The passengers were pouring on to the decks, taking the lifeboats by assault," he was quoted as telling a judge during a hearing to determine whether he should be held in custody on charges of manslaughter and abandoning ship.

"I was trying to get people to get into the boats in an orderly fashion. Suddenly, since the ship was at a 60-70 degree angle, I tripped and I ended up in one of the boats. That's how I found myself in the lifeboat," Schettino said.

The death toll among the 4,200 passengers and crew stands at 11, with 21 people still unaccounted for. Eight bodies have been retrieved from the grounded vessel, while three drowned while trying to reach the shore. One of the bodies found on the vessel was identified on Wednesday as Sandor Feher, 38, a Hungarian violinist who worked on board and was last seen helping crying children into life jackets before returning to his cabin to get his violin.

Italian officials said a German woman who was mistakenly listed among the missing had been located alive in Germany.

Schettino, who took command of the newly launched, 114,500-tonne Costa Concordia in 2006, admitted responsibility for crashing into rocks near the island of Giglio, which tore a hole in the liner.

"I don't know why it happened. I was a victim of my instincts," he said. He confirmed he sailed close to the island to salute a retired captain, Mario Palombo.

Schettino said he was not afraid of a drugs test. "I don't do drugs and I had not drunk," he said.

By grounding the vessel close to the shore after it struck the rocks, he claims he saved the lives of many passengers.

A report released on Wednesday by the judge, Valeria Montesarchio, revealed the ship was sailing at more than 15 knots when it struck the rocks.

Schettino left the vessel while 300 people were still on board. After his "gravely imprudent" behaviour, he remained "completely inert" on the rocks as others scrambled to help the evacuation, the report stated.

The judge also revealed that Schettino had told police he would never go to sea again.

The judge interviewed Roberto Bosio, a cruise ship captain who was on board by chance, and who has been hailed a hero in Italy after he reportedly stayed on the ship to take charge of the evacuation.

The judge's decision to free Schettino from custody and place him under house arrest is to be subject to an appeal by prosecutor Francesco Verusio, who said Schettino "doesn't appear unhappy about what he caused," and could flee.

Verusio questioned Schettino's story about falling into the lifeboat. "Even if he fell in the lifeboat, he could have got back on the [Costa Concordia]," he said.

Support for Schettino came from his parish priest, Father Gennaro Starita, who said the captain was being "killed" by a "media circus".

On Giglio, divers searching for passengers on the half-submerged ship were urgently pulled off the vessel on Wednesday after sensors revealed it had shifted about 1.5 metres. A smaller shift on Monday prompted fears the vessel may move from the rocks on which is now lodged and tumble into the 70-metre depths below.

Navy divers had been planning to blow three holes in the hull with explosive charges after five holes were created on Tuesday to allow access to a lower deck, where divers found five bodies.

As hope fades of finding passengers alive, Italy's environment minister, Corrado Clini, said it would take two weeks to empty the ship's 15 fuel tanks of 2,280 tonnes of fuel to avoid the possibility of a leak.

The tiny port on Giglio has this week become a busy hub for 600 rescue workers and journalists, prompting about 700 winter residents to reopen shops and hotels closed until the summer. Relatives of missing passengers visited the porton Wednesday to meet officials and appeal for information.

Posters appeared on the walls around the port asking for news of Giuseppe Girolamo, 30, an Italian musician who was hired to play in a rock band on the Costa Concordia in December. He was reportedly seen boarding a lifeboat on Friday before jumping back on board the cruise ship to help other passengers disembark.

South Carolina primary live – Rick Perry pulls out

Texas governor Rick Perry pulls out of Republican race
• Iowa GOP strips Mitt Romney of win after ballot confusion
• Newt Gingrich surges in South Carolina as vote nears
• Gingrich's ex wife says he wanted 'open marriage'
• Read a summary of events today
• Read our latest news story on Perry's decision to quit

Rick Perry with wife Anita and his son Griffin after announcing that he is pulling out of the Republican presidential race. Photograph: ERIK S. LESSER/EPA

3.22pm: There's an important update on the quotes critical of Newt Gingrich attributed to Michele Bachmann by a newspaper in Greenville, which I reported earlier today. The Bachmann campaign, according to Politico, says they are "fake".

What a curious business.

3.03pm: Mitt Romney has changed his plans to spend the last two days of the primary campaign in Greenville, the staunchly conservative city in north west of the state. It's a sign that Romney is taking the threat of Gingrich deeply seriously – the former House speaker is clearly the frontrunner for the conservative vote here.

2.52pm: What does Rick Santorum make of Rick Perry's endorsement of his conservative rival, Newt Gingrich? Our reporter Adam Gabbatt has been travelling around with the Santorum campaign.

Adam Gabbatt byline pic

Santorum said he "respects" Rick Perry's decision to endorse Newt Gingrich this afternoon, saying it was "his decision to make", after the Texas governor dropped out of the race.

At a Values Bus tour event in Mount Pleasant – the values bus is basically a conservative lobbying group which travels around the country but does not endorse specific candidates – Santorum said his "heart and prayers" were with Perry and family.

Santorum used the platform here, under the Arthur J Ravenel Jr suspension bridge, to criticise Gingrich, drawing a contrast between his morals and those of the former speaker, in an apparent bid to shore up the Christian, social conservative vote.

Santorum said no one else in the race "walks the walk and talks the talk" on "core convictions" – on the day when Gingrich's ex-wife said he sought an open marriage.

"They've never gone out and fought and been able to be successful in striking a blow for the family, and for faith and for freedom," Santorum said.

"In fact Congressmen Gingrich routinely puts these issues to the back of the bus sees them as controversial issues that need to be avoided."

The event was briefly jnterrupted by Occupy Charleston protesters, critical of Santorum's stance on gay marriage.

2.38pm: On the stump in South Carolina today, Newt Gingrich has been asked about his past adultery – not by journalists, but by a voter who said he otherwise supports him (the guy described him as Churchillian). It's a well-rehearsed response. (Well, it's not as if he hasn't had enough ttime to come up with it.)

I've been very open about my wife and the mistakes I have made, and asking for for forgivenes and to seek reconcilliation.

2.31pm: The Guardian's Ana Marie Cox has a fiery analysis of the position Gingrich finds himself in today – endorsed by Rick Perry but under fire from his ex wife.

Ana Marie Cox

Politicians' – especially conservative politicians' – hypocrisy about marriage is a comedic staple, but that doesn't mean Americans are inured to the kind of grand arrogance exhibited by Gingrich. Asking your wife for an "open marriage" after you've already been having an affair for six years? There's an American idiom about the uselessness of shutting the barn door after the horses have already gotten out; Newt was informing Marianne that the barn door was open, the horses were out, and if she would just clean up the stable, he would be back after he was done screwing.

2.16pm: Back to Iowa for a moment and there's a good analysis from commenter dnjake on what the announcement of the vote flip there.

Live blog: comment

Who actually won Iowa by a few votes has zero consequence. There is no direct connection between the Iowa votes for candidates and the selection of delegates. In order to win the nomination, Romney has to have the votes of the majority of delegates at the national convention.

The only question is whether he or not he is on a track to win those delegates. Trying to evaluate his current status is complicated by the large variation in the processes different states use to actually choose delegates. But, if Romney is generally winning a pluarlity with 40% of the vote, it is hard to see how he would fail to gain the delegates he needs.

Given Paul's role in the race, it is hard to see an alternative emerging who has much prospect of actually challenging Romney to win pluaralities in most states. On the other hand, if Romney can only win a third of the vote, the outcome remains in more doubt. South Carolina and Florida will provide new data points.

1.46pm: Another poll puts Newt Gingrich ahead, by a small margin, in South Carolina. The American Research Group survey puts Gingrich on 33% and Romney on 32%. Ron Paul is in third place with 19% and Rick Santorum is in fourth place with 9%.

Newt Gingrich pinching a lady's nose Newt Gingrich, pinches the nose of Bonnie Ellison, 78, of Easley, South Carolina while shaking hands with supporters at Mutt's Barbeque Photograph: Nathan Gray/AP

 

1.30pm: Here's a summary of events on what has been a busy day so far.

Live blog: recap

Texas congressman Rick Perry has announced that he is pulling out of the Republican race, after a faltering campaign. Perry said there was "no viable path forward for me" and endorsed the former House speaker Newt Gingrich. Perry said Gingrich was "not perfect" but a "true conservative". He said he would return to Texas "with pride".

Newt Gingrich has enjoyed a poll boost today, with a Rasmussen survey putting him two points ahead of Mitt Romney as the remaining candidates prepared for a TV debate tonight. Gingrich said he was "privileged" to accept the endorsement of Perry and said the pair would work together.

But Gingrich was under pressure from an interview on ABC with his second wife, Marianne, who said he had asked her for an "open marriage". She said Gingrich wanted to remain married while having an affair with an aide, Callista Bisek, who went on to become his third wife. Former candidate Michele Bachmann said Gingrich "lacks the poise, experience and moral fiber to represent our principles and values".

Republican party officials announced that Mitt Romney's narrow victory in the Iowa caucuses will be rescinded, piling further pressure on the frontrunner. The state party chairman said the contest cannot be determined due to missing results from eight of the state's 1,774 precincts. Of the results that could be locate, officials say Rick Santorum actually finished 34 votes ahead of Romney, but they would not declare an official winner.

1.09pm: Ewen MacAskill has been speaking to a Perry aide, who has some insight into why the campaign floundered.

Ewen MacAskill

Bob Haus, who was co-chair of the Perry campaign in Iowa, blamed Perry's failure on coming into the race too late, in August, well after the other candidates. "When you get into it late, you compress the window in which you can recover from any mistakes. All candidates make mistakes. Romney has made mistakes this week."

He also thought a major back operation in the spring did not help. "That really set him back. It was painful and he could not sleep. Once he felt better in September and October, you could see the difference."

He predicted the race would now be "a war of attrition from this point" between Romney and Gingrich, with Santorum, short of money, on the wane and Paul still in as "a wild card".

1.06pm: Poll news: A Rasmussun survey out today puts Gingrich ahead for the first time here in South Carolina. He's on 33%, two points ahead of Mitt Romney on 31%. Ron Paul trails on 15% and Rick Santorum on 11%.

12.14pm: Newt Gingrich isn't exactly fond of Europeans, but this open marriage business is all very 18th century France, isn't it?

12.01pm: At his campaign stop in Beaufort, Gingrich is pressed on the issue of his past adultery.

11.53am: Another one of our correspondents, Chris McGreal, is in Greenville, a stoutly conserative city in upstate South Carolina. He reports that Michele Bachmann, who quit the race last year, has given the local paper a withering assessment of Newt Gingrich.

Chris McGreal

While Gingrich was bolstered by Perry's endorsement he is also enduring some withering criticism from Michele Bachmann, the Tea Party loving member of Congress who dropped out of the Republican race. Bachmann told the Greenville News today that Gingrich is totally unfit to be the nominee.

She said: "Through this exhaustive process of consideration, it was strikingly obvious that one candidate could not be less acceptable to be our party's nominee. He lacks the poise, experience and moral fiber to represent our principles and values. That candidate is Newt Gingrich."

Newt and Marianne Gingrich This April 1, 1997 file photo shows Newt Gingrich and his former wife Marianne. Photograph: Toru Yamanaka/AFP/Getty Images

Meanwhile, this file photo shows Marianne and Newt Gingrich in what tabloids always say were "happier times". 

11.46am: My colleague Matt Williams has fleshed out the Rick Perry quotes.

There is no viable path for me in the 2012 campaign. Therefore today I am suspending my campaign and endorsing Newt Gingrich.

Newt is not perfect, but who amongst us is? But there is forgiveness for those who seek God, and I believe in the power of redemption.

He went on:

I know when it is time to make a strategic retreat. I will leave the trail, return to Texas and lie down my 2012 campaign and I will do so with pride.

I will continue to fight for these conservative reforms because the future of our country is at stake and the road we are travelling – President Obama's road – is a dangerous road.

This I know, I'm not done fighting for the cause of conservatism. As a matter of fact, I have just begun to fight.

11.34am: Newt Gingrich is speaking now in Beaufort, South Carolina, saying he was "honored and privileged" to have the endorsement of Rick Perry.

Gingrich says he and Perry spoke this morning – not yesterday as reported earlier – and says he has asked Perry to head up a "tenth amendment enforcement project".

The tenth amendment enshrines the notion that powers not granted to the federal government nor prohibited to the states by the constitution are reserved to states. So this appears to be an effort to bolster Gingrich's credentials on states' rights – an issue central to Ron Paul.

11.31am: Our Washington DC bureau chief, Ewen MacAskill who was at the Perry event, has this analysis of his decsion to quit, saying he ran a "terrible campaign".

Ewen MacAskill

When he joined the race in August, Perry had on paper all the credentials to jump to the top of the polls, which he subsequently did. He was photogenic, had experience of government as governor of Texas and could point to an albeit dubious record of job creation.

But a series of awful debate performances saw him plummet. He said that anyone who did not support a more tolerant approach to immigration had no hear: not what Repubublicans wanted to hear. Then there was his "oops" moment, from which he never recovered.

He got better on the campaign trail but it was too late. Republicans were scathing. One woman in South Carolina described him to me yesterday, on the basis of his debate performances, as "one chip short of a Happy Meal".

Perry did not help his cause by suggesting after Iowa he might quit, only to change his mind the next day. But he is out now, after only managing 4-5% in the polls in South Carolina.

His last service is to help Newt Gingrich. Most of his votes could go to Gingrich, with some to Rick Santorum. In a tight race, with Gingrich surging, that might make the difference to the former House speaker on Saturday in the South Carolina primary and ruin what Romney had hoped would be an easy glide to the Republican nomination.

Ewen also makes the point that Perry's withdrawal could help Gingrich in tonight's debate.

The smaller the number of people on the platform, the more chance of a real debate rather than soundbites. It also gives them more air time. Gingrich is a better debater than Romney.

Gingrich won Monday night's debate, partly explaining his surge in recent days. He needs to repeat that again tonight here in Charleston, in the debate organised by CNN and the Tea Party Patriots. Just as equally Romney needs to come back strong. The fate of the South Carolina primary and maybe even the Republican nomination could be decided tonight.

11.27am: So what to make of that? As Gingrich faces a tough day with the explosive allegations from his former wife, the most significant comment issued by Perry was that he believed in "redemption". It's a powerful image for social conservatives – and it's the only defence that can credibly be advanced in support of the adulterous formoer House speaker. The question is whether it's enough.

11.24am: Perry says he's heading back for Texas, and ends with what should be a rallying call, but sounds more like a death rattle.

I'm not done fighting for the cause of conservatism. As a matter of fact, I've just begun to fight.

11.21am: It's going to be hard to transcribe this. Perry's sentence construction is odd. He's rambling, it's peppered with religious references, he's squinting and stumbling. For such an important speech, it's astonishing that he's improvising.

11.17am: Perry looks exhausted. He says: "There is no viable path forward for me today. Therefore I'm suspending my campaign and endorsing Newt Gingrich."

He says of Gingrich that "we've had our differences", and adds: "Newt is not perfect, but who amongst us is?" Gingrich says there is "forgiveness for those who seek God", and that Perry believes in "the power of redemption". Gingrich is a "true conservative", he says.

11.14am: Rick Perry's press conference is starting now. Flanked by his wife, he begins by thanking his campaign team, and says what a "privilege it is to learn and grow under you".

I think the issue was that didn't learn and grow enough, wasn't it?

11:07am: I've just been speaking to our correspondent Ewen MacAskill who's at the other side of Charleston from me, waiting to get into the Rick Perry press conference. It sounds like something of a scrum.

Like his campaign, Perry's final press conference of the campaign was a shambles. He opted to hold it in a room too small for the press pack, with lots of journalists unable to get in. The short notice did not help either, with major networks unable to get to the hotel in north Charleston on time.

Meanwhile after the Iowa results fiasco, some are questioning why the state insists it has a near-divine right to be the first to vote in presidential nomination races.

10.40am: They said it would get dirty, and it has. ABC News has released a preview of tonight's Nightline interview with Marianne Gingrich, second wife of the former House speaker. The most damaging line: she alleges Newt wanted an "open marriage", so he could have both a mistress and a wife.

She said when Gingrich admitted to a six-year affair with a Congressional aide, he asked her if she would share him with the other woman, Callista, who is now married to Gingrich.

"And I just stared at him and he said, 'Callista doesn't care what I do,'" Marianne Gingrich told ABC News. "He wanted an open marriage and I refused."

Marianne described her "shock" at Gingrich's behavior, including how she says she learned he conducted his affair with Callista "in my bedroom in our apartment in Washington."

"He always called me at night," she recalled, "and always ended with 'I love you.' Well, she was listening."


Readers will no doubt remember that Gingrich was at the forefront of those who condemned President Bill Clinton for his lack of moral leadership – and is now leading the moral charge against gay marriage.

10.25am: Back to those Iowa results, and the state GOP has confirmed the Des Moines Register exclusive that, of the votes that could be counted, Rick Santorum had 34 more than Mitt Romney in the final tally.

At a news conference, Iowa Republican party chairman Matt Strawn said he could not name official winner because some votes can't be counted. Results from eight of the state's 1,774 precincts are missing.

Just as I did on the early morning hours on January 4, I congratulate senator Santorum and governor. Romney on a hard-fought effort during the closest contest in caucus history.

Mitt Romney has attempted to brush off the flip, saying it amounted to a "virtual tie".

Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney hugs his wife Ann Mitt Romney, the Republican presidential candidate and former Massachusetts governor, hugs his wife, Ann, at his Iowa caucus rally in Des Moines, Iowa. Photograph: Rick Wilking/Reuters

According to the certified results, Santorum got 29,839 votes with Romney at 29,805, a difference of 34. Ron Paul came in third with 26,036.

 

10.10am: Could this be a nightmare scenario for Mitt Romney? Today it was announced that he didn't win Iowa after all, and now it's clear that Newt Gingrich is catching up in South Carolina. The idea of Romney's inevitability has been founded on the basis that he was on course to an unprecedented triple win in the first three states. If Gingrich pulls off a dramatic upset in South Carolina, that would mean Romney would only have won New Hampshire, his adopted home state. In that scenario most, if not all, bets would be off.

10.03am: It seems that Newt Gingrich has been courting the Perry camp in the past few days, with Politico saying he has been repeatedly texting the Perry campaign manager Joe Allbaugh. Politico goes on to say:

The discord within the Perry campaign was evident even as the candidate prepared to drop out. Top officials in Texas said they were unaware of his intentions and as late as this morning said they genuinely didn't know whether he was still running.

Perry has been unpredictable before — back in Texas to reassess his campaign's viability following his fifth place finish in the Iowa caucuses, Perry surprised even many in his inner circle by personally tweeting a message saying he was staying in the race, and heading to South Carolina to campaign.

9.46am: Rick Perry will endorse Newt Gingrich when he speaks at 11am here in Charleston. Gingrich is certainly the man with the momentum at the moment, and this endorsement will be a huge shot in the arm ahead of tonight's debate.

Mark Halperin of Time magazine says Gingrich and Perry met secretly yesterday – and speculates that if Perry channels is Texas fundrasing machine towards Gingrich, that would be an even more significant move.

9.33am: Rick Perry is understood to be holding a press conference at 11am to confirm that he is pulling out of the race later this morning.

9.22am: CNN is reporting that Rick Perry, the Texas governor who entered the race as frontrunner but is now trailing all the other main candidates, will pull out of the race today. It's significant that CNN should break this story – the network is hosing the debate tonight, and if Perry has indicated he will not take part, they would be the first to know.

9.16am: Newt Gingrich was on the Today show just after 7am this morning, and host Ann Curry pressed him hard on accusations that he had played the "race card" in order to gain ground in South Carolina, a state where, as Curry pointed out, the Confederate flag flies over the capitol building in Columbia – a politically charged symbol that was supported by Republicans here. Gingrich was bullish, saying that the race card criticism was levelled by his oppponents who had "no defense of liberal solutions that have failed".

Curry also pressed him on whether he was worried what his former wife, Marianne, would say in an ABC interview tonight. He revealed that his daughters have written to the president of ABC news, asking him not to air the interview. "Intruding into family things that are more than a decade old is just wrong," he said. "I am a 68-year-old-granfather. People see how close I am to my wife Calista."

Ah, pity poor Newt, the cuddly grandfather.

9.06am: Here's a full summary of the main news lines of the campaign today, compiled by Ryan Devereaux.

Live blog: recap

Republican party officials are set to announce that Mitt Romney's narrow victory in the Iowa caucuses will be rescinded. At 9:15am ET the chairman of Iowa's Republican party is expected to announce that the winner of the Iowa contest cannot be determined due to missing results from eight of the state's 1,774 precincts. Of the results that could be locate, officials say Rick Santorum actually finished 34 votes ahead of Romney.

The Iowa caucuses do not determine the number of delegates accorded to the winner of the contest, so the change-up does not materially alter the race for the Republican nomination. It may, however, provide a renewed sense of momentum for Rick Santorum as the candidates head into this weekend's primaries in South Carolina.

Newt Gingrich is enjoying a surge in popularity following Monday night's raucous South Carolina debate. A new NBC News/Marist poll shows that while Mitt Romney still leads the race by 10 points, Gingrich is gaining considerable ground. Coming into Monday night's debate Romney held a 15 point lead over Gingrich, with 37% of likely South Carolina primary voters expressing support for the former Massachusetts governor. By Tuesday Romney's lead over Gingrich had been cut to just five points. The former House Speaker received numerous rounds of applause Monday night for defending his characterization of Barack Obama as a "food stamp president" and calling on Romney to release his tax records.

Gingrich's popularity with cultural conservatives will be tested tonight as ABC is airs an interview with his second wife. His marriage to Marianne Gingrich has been the subject of much scrutiny. The former speaker reportedly proposed to Marianne while he was still married to his first wife and has admitted to infidelity with former congressional aide Callista Bisek, who went on to become his third wife. Gingrich says he and Marianne now have no relationship.

Candidates tonight take part in their final TV debate before Saturday's primary. The remaining five – Romney, Gingrich, Santorum, Ron Paul and Rick Perry – will face off in Charleston, South Carolina in a two-hour debate sponsored by CNN and the Southern Republican Leadership Conference.

9.00am: Good morning: this is Matt Wells reporting from Charleston, South Carolina, and welcome to our continuing live coverage of the Republican presidential nomination process. And the process itself is in some disarray this morning with the Iowa GOP announcing that it can't tell us who won the vote in its state.

On the night, it was announced that Mitt Romney had won by a wafer-thin margin of eight votes. Today, the Iowa GOP is due to announce that according to the results that it has audited, Rick Santorum snatched it by 34 votes.

But it's not prepared to issue a certified result, because votes from eight precincts are missing.

There'll be an official announcement from the Iowa GOP soon. Also today, there are signs that Newt Gingrich is building on his strong performance from Monday's TV debate – with another one scheduled for tonight. And with Gingrich due to release his tax returns, it's shaping up to be a busy day.

Comments

189 comments, displaying

first

Show comments in new window |

or to join the conversation

  • This symbol indicates that that person is The Guardian's staffStaff
  • This symbol indicates that that person is a contributorContributor
  • Britcominghome

    19 January 2012 2:24PM

    Oh please please please GOP choose Gingrich as the presidential candidate.

    He doesn't stand a snowball's chance in hell of beating Obama. Obama will be laughing all the way to the voting booth.

  • tsubaki

    19 January 2012 2:25PM

    Fox are - somewhat gleefully - saying that Perry will drop out and endorse Gingrich.

  • IReadTheArticle

    19 January 2012 2:29PM

    "It's significant that CNN should break this story – the network is hosing the debate tonight . . "

    I couldn't have put it better.

    Actually, the whole "debate"-"primary" thing is pretty much hosed. Time to abandon these wastes of money entirely?

  • DamnWymz

    19 January 2012 2:29PM

    Can I mention here that Colbert's campaign to get people to vote for him through Herman Cain is %*!£ing brilliant?

  • gixxerman006

    19 January 2012 2:31PM

    Gingrich is a real piece of work.
    Serving divorce papers to one of his ex wives as she lay in her hospital bed recovering from surgery no less.

    One was dumped for not being attractive enough as his political wife (hmmm, shades of the secretly gay British tory MPs advised to get a wife for appearances.....how vile is that?) and then there is his current one.
    Wow.
    Not in a good way.
    That fake everything plastic look down to a tee......does that really appeal to regular people?

    But of course when it comes to the right-wing their moralising about personal behaviour and values is for other people, never themselves.

    Spot the hypocrites.

  • phaine

    19 January 2012 2:32PM

    I wish that the liberal press would stop using GOP (Grand Old Party) to describe the modern republican party. There's nothing grand about them now, they're all batshit crazy.

  • HappyValley

    19 January 2012 2:41PM

    I have to say that I feel diminished whenever one of the Republican candidates withdraws. They are all so off their heads and they provide such wonderful entertainment value.

    Is there still time for Sarah Palin to make a comeback? Please.

  • CrystalMethod

    19 January 2012 2:42PM

    One less nutter in the running. Sadly, Gingrich is still there, and he's completely batshit crazy as well.

  • HerrEMott

    19 January 2012 2:43PM

    Rick Perry appeared to be a complete idiot so I suppose it's good news.

    Gingrich is a nasty piece of work. I bet his ex-wife is gleefully relishing her chance to assassinate his character live on TV. I certainly sounds as if she has grounds to do so.

    Romney still looks like the only candidate who might ever be electable, though I don't think he'd beat Obama.

    Poospunk's crazy anti-gay comments over the years make him unelectable.

    Ron Paul has given his opponents all the ammo they need.

  • MeandYou

    19 January 2012 2:44PM

    In the other breaking news Rick Santorum won Iowa by 32 votes. The entertainment value has just gone up.

  • Contributor
    JonNorris

    19 January 2012 2:48PM

    You don't have to be in the pew every Sunday to realise that Rick Perry is batshit insane and shouldn't be let within a country mile of the White House.

  • tsubaki

    19 January 2012 2:48PM

    Ron Paul's opponents dont really need ammo (after all, its difficult to actually argue against most of his platform), they just need to point loudly and declaim "look at the extremist!" over and over again.

  • roganis

    19 January 2012 2:55PM

    Texas governor Rick Perry pulls out of Republican race

    At 9:15am ET the chairman of Iowa's Republican party is expected to announce that the winner of the Iowa contest cannot be determined due to missing results from eight of the state's 1,774 precincts.

    Were the problems caused by "hanging chads" perhaps? Maybe, the GOP should ask an independent outsider (Al Gore?) to investigate.

  • Kibblesworth

    19 January 2012 2:56PM

    There's only one candidate with even the remotest chance of beating Obama, and that's Mitt Romney. Why the Republican Party are either entertaining the other candidates, and their mental ways, is a mystery.

  • babytiger

    19 January 2012 2:59PM

    I've said it before - Perry's performance since July has to have been one of the biggest disappointments in primary history (among 'serious' candidates anyway). He's really shown how low the bar is set to be governor of a state. The anti-Jed Bartlet, if you will.

    Does this help Gingrich? Yes, financially, and in terms of potential support. It also solidifies his position as not-Romney. Santorum needs a great debate tonight and a really eye-catching few days or it's curtains for him come Wednesday.

    Still hard to see how Gingrich seriously challenges Romney throughout primary season, but keeps the question open into February at least, I think. And Gingrich doesn't beat Obama. Not unless the economy completely tanks.

  • MeandYou

    19 January 2012 2:59PM

    Many other news media is now going with news. Final winner of Iowa: Rick Santorum.

    Lets the circus begins. It likely to be blood bath at Rep from now on:

    Breaking News @BreakingNews 21m

    Reply
    Retweet
    Favorite
    · Open

    Rick Santorum won Jan 3 Iowa Republican US presidential caucuses by 34 votes, according to certified results - @Reuters

  • californiaroad

    19 January 2012 3:00PM

    Come on Gingrich!!! Bring down Romney's Temple.

    I think all old Newt wants to do is get a historic debate with President Obama.He doesn't have to win. He just want to see himself in the thirty minute Lincoln-Douglas debate. So he can land himself in the pages of history.

  • Gelion

    19 January 2012 3:00PM

    Romney : He is too Liberal for most of the Conservative Republican voters.

    Gingrich, Perry, Paul : They are too Conservative for most main stream Republicans and would not be able to take on Obama.

    ...

    There will be only one winner of this election and it will be Obama - though not perhaps by a huge landslide because of the race and economy issues if/when Romney gets the R. ticket.

    2016 will be the big test for the Democrats, with, one assumes, Clinton their nomination.

  • Haigin88

    19 January 2012 3:00PM

    "....Gingrich is a nasty piece of work. I bet his ex-wife is gleefully relishing her chance to assassinate his character live on TV. I certainly sounds as if she has grounds to do so......".

    Here's hoping that she turns that porcine-faced thug into figurative bacon.

  • wattys

    19 January 2012 3:07PM

    Ron Paul had better start thinking about his security arrangements as he is toast if the banksters think for one second that their man - and that is everyone else - isn't getting in. End the Fed.

  • gadfly55

    19 January 2012 3:08PM

    2 Catholics, a Mormon and a Libertarian walk into a bar in Florence, South Carolina.

    They walk in single file, smallest guy in front, with the three big guys jostling one another to stay at the back.

    All the regulars turn and stare at them, and stare at them some more.

    Then they're gone.

    Not from these parts, says the bar-keep.

  • Damien

    19 January 2012 3:11PM

    What would Gingrich's chances be in the general election, should he win the nomination? This is getting scary....

  • Silversunpickup

    19 January 2012 3:11PM

    Newt Gingrich is the man with the momentum?

    Obama must be over the moon.

    It's all academic anyway. Romney will win the nomination and lose the election. Ron Paul should run as a third candidate, as much as he's a christian lunatic, he does have plenty of legitimate things to say about expansionism and endemic corruption. Which places him in a unique position as the only person in US politics mentioning issues that exist in reality.

  • AVoiceFromAmerica

    19 January 2012 3:11PM

    Looks like another happy day on the campaign trail for RoboRomney.

    He didn't win in Iowa, as many of us suspected.

    Perry and Palin endorsed Newt.

    Ron Paul is showing no signs of leaivng the race, so he'll keep getting 2o or 25pct of the primary vote (and delegates to match).

    And the Bain Capital is the gift that just keeps on giving to Newt, who's catching up in the SC polls.

    We're gonna have ourselves a hung GOP convention.

    That's when the fun really begins, and when Obama clinches the race.

  • nattybumpo

    19 January 2012 3:12PM

    The real election in November has always been Obama's to lose. But I don't think he can easily fail against any of these clowns! They're unbelievable..........

  • ngavc

    19 January 2012 3:15PM

    Lots of silliness going on. Will the interview with Newt's ex have any impact? Will Romney start to play offense, knowing the old football saying, that defense wins games?

    Only one recent item got my blood boiling?

    The Obama administration rejected the construction of the Keystone XL oil pipeline from Canada to the Gulf of Mexico

    The man who made that decision should not be president, IMHO. The ups and downs of the Republican nominating process pale in comparison. All the Republican contenders would do better for the American working person.

  • FatCat08

    19 January 2012 3:17PM

    Top officials in Texas said they were unaware of his intentions and as late as this morning said they genuinely didn't know whether he was still running.

    Ah that explains the last three weeks then. Perhaps he wasn't even runnning.

    In any case there are three good reasons for him to give up the race, but I'm afraid I forgot them all.